✦ Karnataka High Court · 29 Nov 2011

Kashinath s / o Madhavarao Nadigere v. Malatesh sb Fakirappa Hoolikatti & Ors.

Case Details Karnataka High Court · 29 Nov 2011
Court
Karnataka High Court
Decided
29 Nov 2011
Length
1,027 words

Summary

A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.

Precedent status

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

Original judgment text

Judgment

1. Malatesh sb Fakirappa Hoolikatti, Age: Major, 0cc.: Business, Rio Deraragodda village in Ranebennur Taluk, Haven District.

2. The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. ltd., Shamanur Building, Chamarajpet, Bangalore. [By Stiri M.K. Soudagar, Advocate for R2) - Appellant - Respondents This appeal is filed under Section 173 (1) of M .V. Act against the judgment and award dated 06.01.2007 passed in M.V.C. No. 658/2002 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. On.) & Prl. JMFC & Mdl. MACT, Ranebennur. ? 7 — ) C : - ) ) C E C C C ) C C ) C C m ’ i D _ _ _ 0 r u z 0 t ) ) ) 9 C C ) i L — C C C - ) C : r C ) C _ — , ) C - ) C ’ ) . - C ‘ ) ( ’ ) 9 ) ) - 9 C ( H ) A C A C C C L C H ) C H H ) C - 2 5 1 9 5 1 - 2 H C C 9 H . — H L C . — r _ - ) C ) C ) U C C C A C 1 - H ) C - c ) C C ) C — r r ‘ _ _ i A C ) C — — 5 L C H ) C L C ) C ) C ; A r 5 5 : i ) H C 5 1 - * ) ç ) C A C 0 4 - C C C 5 1 L C , . L C ) C ( - 2 A C - 9 9 p C C C C L C r ) C ( . . 5 1 L C - ) C - 5 1 ) ) C H H ) C L C 1 4 ) C A C 2 — ) C A C H H A C 2 A C 2 c ) ) C C P 5 5 ) C ) C . 9 p - H . t - r A C A C ) C ) C 9 4 _ 2 - 2 A C - ) ) C C A C ) C C C A C ’ ) C ) C A C ) C A r ) C ) ) C C 2 L C - — ) C ) C A C H % A C - 2 ) ) C C L C C A C A C ) C C C - 2 — ) C - 2 5 4 ) C — - 2 A C . r A C ) ) ) C C C - ) C — ) C ) C ) C “ — t C ) C A C - 2 . . ) A C A C s - 0 Q 0 9 5 1 n ; 2 - - 2 ) C A r ‘ A C ) C H L C H H p ) ) C 2 t 2 , . . 5 5 ( - 2 A C - 2 5 5 ) C ) C 9 : ) C ) P C ) C r C — A C L C - ) C t r A C ) C H C ) C 9 — p — ) C ) C L C H ? - j ‘ H A r ) C H 4 - A C A C ) C — z - - ) ) — A C ) C t r L C 9 ) C 5 5 2 A C H H ) C 4 ) N ) C ) C 4 ) C ) C H ) C L C ) 9 L — 9 C A C A C ) ) C C A C H r c ) C A r C C ) C H i 2 n p — A C - ) C i A C • - < A C A C H A C ) 1 P - - ’ 4 ) C ) C C 2 — ) — C - ) C A C + r — - ) C A C t — n - — C - r ) C 9 A — C ) A C A C ) C C A C C ) ( 9 H ) t C C D D C ) l C O C : 2 ) t C C D S ) I ( C D : i D 9 o( D ) t C — S ) C — 0 . L i D 0 o ) C - H D C 9 D C — - C D i ) D C D C - ) C D C - ° i D C D 9 C D S 0 — c 1 9 S E i D - - r D C C D S E i D l i i 0 C C D D - S E . d C D - ) l C C D i D l D 0 S E 0 l D C C 0 S - E 9 - 0 l C D C S 9 9 9 S E < C D — l D o - D C H — j C D - 0 l S E D D 9 ) t C 9 . i : C D $ 9 — i D * ) C C J ’ - r f I — - ‘ S E <

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments