Judgment · High Court · 2009
Judgment
I “ . i i c c ) 5 4 “ ; c c c — N “ . c c c ‘ ” H , - 4 ‘ ; c c c i c c c c c S - c 0 ‘ “ i c c 4 ( i c c c 4 ( 4 ( ’ 4 4 % 4 4 ’ i i c - 4 - 5 4 i - _ 4 4 — 4 Q Q i - 1 — ’ . C ( 2 5 c c c : 2 5 ‘ 4 “ ) . 1 ’ 4 “ “ 3 - 2 5 i c ) - 4 t i c % - N _ i c c “ : 2 5 c c c ) L ’ , 1 4 4 ‘ - ‘ 1 & N N c : i c c 3 4 ?i c c - N _ 5 , c c r — c r c , 4 ‘ S - 0 3 - — *H “ “ : 3 3 5 ‘ , 3 3 ” ” 4 “ ) ’ , , I c c “ t i b i 3 3 3 c c c S - c 4 5 - t i c c c C H c c c c C c c ” 2 5 c c - 4 3 N ‘ 4 “ 4 ‘ 3 i c - 5 - 4 2 ’ 2 . c c - i c c c ’ t - c t i - :5 2 ; • ; : . 5 3 ‘ ; ° ’ c , 4 ‘ 5 c c 4 ‘ ’ t I S _ c c c c 4 ‘ 4 ‘ ’ 4 I “ H c c c i c — ‘ — ‘ ? t i $ c c c c c ‘ ‘ ’ c c c c c ” ” 4 ‘ t i L “ ) ‘ 4 i S 4 ‘ c c 4 ‘ t i H ‘ t L ‘ ‘ 3 ? _ 3 c c c - c 4 c c c c ; c c ‘ c c ’ F 1 I S I I 4 c c 3 £ c c I ‘ S i , c 4c 4 ’ 4 I — 1 4 4 4 4 ‘ c— H \ & 4 4 ‘ — c c 4 5 4 C 4 1 3 : ” 4 i c c c c S u t N 4 ‘ - c c 4 c c c c ‘ I t t i ’ 4 & 4 ‘ ’ 5 4 - 4 ’ C 3 3 c c c S 4 ‘ H ’ 4 ’ 4 ‘ i c c i L ’ ” ’ 4 4 4 , x 4 — c c c t r • i c c c ’ - 4 S - i 0 3 ’ % 4 1 c c 1 4 ‘ c c t r ) ’ 5 5 . t C 4 4 4 ‘ c c — 4 c c c c c ) % 5 . , C t C 0 1 0 1 R C a i . 14 . 3 a‘ h d i l ‘ L i l i J 1 $ x a q I I j a 0 1 1 1 S B z N 2 I 0 5% ‘1i K a r ø I o ? e ‘ g 0 3 t ) % 1 I [ • : { I j f r w j i I E t i i I i I I x11t l i t j j S I ’ t , 2 I i2 — J b i ,2C i C i i i i n i n i t r z 2 ’ 8 ‘ 8 . 4 p — — — • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ’ ! h I i i i P 0 E . : j 1 T 1 • ’ n I , 2 I K I I L I‘ a 9 flI •ittatt ii ti kL C It 1 0t iit C Ut 0 Ia 1:4* TI-Em .. s,. .i-atcna ‘. n-.’,t41 .. ijtgw4 7% 4 - fl •lk wn ‘- r. !. -. •- 4’i tie it h-V fl •t’ •h- . 1’ .ct’ -. (• 11,1,’? I t t I 7II I I
1 itt H C -.‘ c 1$- I. a - a * t S S I I ‘ t r i •1• 1 I. 1 1 1’ I,,,) I j ..r .ti .4 1’.i •‘.l 1 •); f ‘ I’ ‘ lt1 I )‘t’I II 9( j(t ‘ a Pt C . t9.it ii’ i iji i(aCe ‘ .1 • -11 •e Ji,r ksl-- • Ii 5’- •-Ir La. C .i I I. I 5 - a p • ‘¼ 4 H ) C S : H m E H H Q J - - C C i H m
0 . — D D I 2 S s c H C 0S - m c m m 0 l p C 4 - C C 0 t r P1 i - i - , r l C l C p t r i L l C a i c i c - m t — r : D C mP c 0 5 9 Y D H C P ) l C i c ) 0 . H l C . - m c H ) D r C C m c c C ) a — — Hc m C ( D C a p ) C C C ? i — l c C - l C 0 — S C S ) - J Y m Y D C S H — ° i c — C — c - . : m D C l f i g C — 5 t c I 4 N H l i C P - t r H m c D C a E — - P - 0 C C C D
t ‘ I ‘ ) C ) ) C C o - C C o — H D C C ) ( t D p c - o m c i c i c H m c a
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.