G SEETHAMMA v. D KONDAMMA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAM MOHAN REDDY
Outcome
Withdrawn
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY RS.A. No.769/2007 (MON) BETWEEN G SEETHAMMA W/O R.M. VENKATARAMUDU, AGE: 53 YEARS, R/O 5TH CROSS, VISHWESHWARAIAH NAGAR, KAPPAGAL ROAD, BELLARY-583 101. (By SRI. Y LAKSHMIKANT REDDY, ADV.) .APPELLANT AND D KONDAMMA W/O D DURGAPPA, AGE: 68 YEARS, RIO. MADHU NIVAS, S.G.HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, BELLARY-583 101. (BY RESP. IS SERVED) RESPONDENT AND THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DECREE DT.15.9.2006 IN R.A,NO.20/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), BELLARY, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SE’ITING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.7.1.2005 PASSED IN O.S.NO.297/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN), BELLARY. PASSED 7 THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned Counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.