✦ Karnataka High Court

H.M.Chowdappa v. Chethak International Cargo Ltd., Owner of the lorry bearing

SUBHASH B ADI

Judgment

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMfl7EE, DHARWAD BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12Th DAY OF APRIL 2011 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B. ADI AND SRI N.S. KULKARNI, MEMBER Miscellaneous First Aooeal No.2518/2007 Lok Adalat No.323/2011 BETWEEN H.M.Chowdappa, S/o Mareppa, Aged about 21 years, Student, ITI College, R/o Sakalapuradahatti, Hulikere Post, Tq. Kudligi, Dist: Bellary. (By Sri. Y.Lakshmikant Reddy, Adv.) AND I. Chethak International Cargo Ltd., Owner of the lorry bearing Reg. No.HR-38/J-1564, T/o 5 T, FF Centre, Panjabi Bag, New Delhi.

2.

The Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Bellary. Appellant (By Sri. R.R.Mane, Adv. for R-2, Notice Ri dispensed with) Respondents MEA filed under Section 1 /$ I) judgment a.nd award dated 22 O62OO6 gassed in. MVC No95/ 1.1004 on the file of the dudpe, (Sr. Dn) cum Member. VI MACT, of M ,V,Aci. agai nat I —‘ “ seekina en llancent cot at cornoci enrton 11 This appeal coming on for conciliation before .Lok Adalat t.he following after being referred vide ord.er dated 18,0fo201 1,, conciliation order is gas seT. CUNCILIATIOI’i_URDER Both sides a.re prrsent. After negotiation, the parties have arrived a.t a settlement. A joint memo is filed in this regard. TI j T 60,000/ — in Iumpsum, )e.n.g the full and. fina I settlement. of the cla.im of the appellant. 3 Both the parties have sian eel the consent memo

4.

The se.cond respondent the adreed amount before th.e TACT, wthn a period of six weeks from the da.te of sha.lI deposit t ol con cl ii is In case It, h. awn sha.1 carry nter eat at. 1: tie en. tool 0 . p a. , iii Ot ii. expi r ii siX weeks periori. / - J Tm

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments