Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DILIP B BHOSALE
Outcome
Withdrawn
Petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. / TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED CORPORATE OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, CYBERTECH, HOUSE PLOT NO.B-63/65, ROAD NO. 21/35, J.B. SAWANTH MARG, WAGLE ESTATE, THANE WEST. RAMESH D. Sb. DASANAYAK, RIO. H.NO. 469/XXI, BELAGAL CROSS, OLD FOREST QUARTERS, COWL BAZAAR, BELLARY-583102. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE WRIT PETITION No. 60471/20 12 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MOHAN S. AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RIO. C.M.C. COLONY, BELGAL CROSS, BELLARY. (BY SRI M. AMARE GOUDA, ADV.) AND:
Operative part
/ TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED CORPORATE OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, CYBERTECH, HOUSE PLOT NO.B-63/65, ROAD NO. 21/35, J.B. SAWANTH MARG, WAGLE ESTATE, THANE WEST. RAMESH D. Sb. DASANAYAK, RIO. H.NO. 469/XXI, BELAGAL CROSS, OLD FOREST QUARTERS, COWL BAZAAR, BELLARY-583102. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BELLARY, 21/11/2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-D. IN EXP. NOJ7O/2011 ON THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: PC: Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Withdrawal of the writ petition shall not preclude the petitioner from taking appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance, as may be available in law. hnm/
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.