Judgment · High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
0 i c 2 2 2 2 *( 2 C 2 ( r o - ; ) 1 ( 2 ( 2 2 ) 2 ( ) 2 ( ) 2 ) 2 - ) 2 * l C 2 ( l C l 2C ( — l C l C J - ) 2 ( ‘ - 0 / 2 2 c S — 2 2 ) ) 2 - l f l 0 ( C — l - C 0 ( . 0 2 2 2 1 ( - / - ( . 0 ) ) 2 ’ 2 2 1 ( 2 2 2 2 2 1 ( 2 ( ’ 2 0 ( 2 2 ( 5 - ) C 5 l C 2 ( — r o 2 2 2 2 1 ( 2 2 — - 2 ( — — - • / 2 2 2 2 ) 2 ( 2 2 ) ) 2 0 ( — ’ 2 ) ) 2 0 ( 1 a 2 2 2 -2 2 2 . 0 ) C 2 ( — 2 ( 2 ( 2 2 - t C 5 l C 2 ( 2 2 ( 2 ( 2 ( 2 2 l CC * C 2 2 2 ( 5 o 2 2 2 1 ( 2 2 0 ( 2 2 ) 2 ( — C — - J - S 2 2 1 2 ( 2 ( 2 ( 2 2 ( 2 1 ( - 2 ( l C C 5 2 1 ( . 0 5 C — l C - - 2 ( 2 ( - l C 2 ( S 2 2 2 2 2 52 l 2 ( C 2 2 ’ 2 z - 2 1 ( l 2 2 C E 2 2 l 2 2 C 2 2 . ) 2 2 ( 2 2 l C 2 ( - 2 2 2 ( 2 2 ( L 1 • 1 . 0 ( Q T ( 2 ( 2 2 o - - 2 ( - . 0 4 C l C S - 2 2 i c C 2 ( - H l C 2 )> ( * _ J _ ) 2 ( - ) ) 2 ’ 2 4 l C t - 5 2 2 J 2 2 2 ( 2 2 — i ) 2 . 0 ) X ( ) 1 C) Thc appeal. ihertfo,e. stands allmvecl in p:nt to thr abmr extent U at ned counsel Shn I) B Kariar has ciSsiStCd tlit a s u-itt is ‘itiat n in rnattcr appre’ iat’n’ issistaulce Keui b the le1inacl counsel, a fee of Rs.3.000• is fixed which shall 1)1’ paid
to the learned counsel forthsuth b the Registn. I ha a’ U, I
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 08 Dec 2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.