Judgment · High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 1212. With observations, writ petition is allowed. Order passed in M.A.No.9/2005 by the District Judge, Bagalkot
Judgment
t s - 3 S . 4 u • V 1 ‘ 3 . s M 3 in quesu)n. fwo ordet camc to be passed on I ‘ .7 2005 calling upon pet itinnet nerein to hand ut cr possession 01 nc als’. á it Cdl’ o at imc nag to Rs!t74 “ob. t’tgether with iprerest ft,t ‘tic- pctlna 1. )n9 ye Mi’ .Y)03
kggncved hi tnc order 31 c’iction passed mder S ciba ( I I of the Act petitior er is s id to I nc filed an appeal before L)istrict Judge. Bagalkot Misc Appeal N 8 (C rc c r oi b iespnndent ‘aider Section 7i 1) of the ‘\ct for pat ment of rrrars of j rtItionL pefe red t11 tippe€ bt fore t % C 1)41 C 1) a J Ig 9ga1k.g ‘wdrd hvitji ijic -tjpeais ‘md .‘ i tnr .or •r’kr I t it — a •‘ I ‘F pa std 11 Its £ tç a ‘i r. ‘ h “in x r o £nQ8 ‘.S t.” . r,p .LJtL%. L”’’ • ‘%fl 1 ‘ I— p’ —1 ,. 1( ki’ •.L • F’- ... r’.’.tt.cn 1
1. •) I I V 1’’ :4.. ( I W I . 3? t ‘ — a a 2 . t ‘ 4 t I S s . c b - I £ 1 4 . r 0 0 S . S s 1 . t t . r C 0 C 4 - £ a V & a U . W • ‘ C l - ‘ • I . p a a t t .
C t a .a — c C ) p 4 4 . 0 ’ ‘ 1 ‘ 5 a . 4 . ( e ‘ . n t S . - a . e 4 . ‘ L . £ 4 4 . t a c a Q m 1 ) 7 ) 4 1 C ; 4 . a f t C . -a2 a t S 4 0 C ‘ 5 ‘ i 5 e t o • g ‘ 0 4 ) ‘ 0 2 ‘ 0 e e n 2 a t L A C A C 4 I ’ C t . ) C ‘ 4 . z S . ’ 4 :‘ _ 4 4 r - 0 t o - 4 . ‘ E t a 4a t‘ C c t- t 0 c . . 4 - • t o 1 A ‘ - . A I . I O I t A - • 4 . t — t o • 1 ) g . 0 ‘ C 4 . 4 ) r o t ’ B . a 0 . w t o 4 0 4 C . 4 . C o C 0 a . a n • 4 - 4 . r C - I - . t o t 4 . £ 0 r - ? i t I t 4 - 4 . t C L ‘ 0 C C E ) c C a 5 I t 1 ) Ct ‘ a 4 C l ; C a 0 4 4 - I t C V eI , 4 1 I C r - C o t a 4 . W I C p b % z i r ‘ C O ‘ 4 C O A A i l l 9 — • - a . : : - a e a £ I 4 ‘ 0 1 ) ‘ C . S t p a 1 : , E E C - V , L C . a t C O m I ) . C C .I I V t ‘ 3 ‘ C ’ . C C C o • t b 4 . C C ‘ t I ; I 1 . I 4 - — . C ( 2 4 . t ) I C 4 . I t V C o C a I c S 4 . & t t I 4 a C 4 . a 1L c . 3 D C 0 • ’ Q C i ) 0 . 4 ’ *b 4 4 . ‘ i j - , 4 ‘ ’ a 3 I W a B 0 D C I - c m I ‘ & 2 ’ L t 2 ‘ ° d I . ) ’ a I • D ‘ * • I I W . 3 D C t - B s I , 0 D C - ) 0 e C a b — . C . 4 t ’ C z I 3I - — ‘ 4 f l , I b ’ 7 F ‘ C F - 3 D C S 1 r - ‘ ‘ 3 U 4 . ‘ ; C . i c 3 ) b ‘ i O C ‘ D i t • 1 ? 0 1 ‘ - 0 - U C D ‘ ’ ; a I ‘ . 4 3 3 1 1 : C w ‘ n r : ‘ a ) 2 1 1 ) 0 ) 3 ! ’ w 4 I ! . 0 - * I ‘ D - 4 4 1 3 4 3 3 q p - 1 ‘ a 3 q 1 5 ‘ ) 0 4 S , 3 * g S 1 1 . .9- the At t whi-h relates to Pcn er o’ the authoi it; to recover arrears nf rt’it ni .Jamuges in iespe..t tif public premises.
It n acts as ui let kt n , 141cc ,7y r.. rt payublc ‘C’ fit. Sqt (r’r’r” nmeizt o, o meal authority r a c’oiporatc authority in nsrect of urp ublk pr ni 0% ompc rent fT ‘ wy y d . qr c’tp’r nt)ra ‘he a irne wzti-in g’•cz ?im’- and ir’ LrSrainct’r’rc as may 1.w $DC citied i’z the “icier. (,llhLe ,‘z,r’c O. 1 n ‘C a 1 yin ic . ‘t:%v” J-e .r1p..t fl e,’tt’r tttflq. f(b’i?1t1 iC’s 41 1 .. —.,.i, ‘ .J ..‘ScT’ ,:t i & r A’f n — E .1 - ‘ c 7 ( A( tl( ‘ •J r 4.. ;— .,F 1’ JI(19 ii. • ,.7s; • ‘:1. —• • ‘ t t a a. t 1 . C I I, I . a - a . 5 I l b Q ) C S - S t t 4 - 4 5 p1 b 0 S . S t F 3 4 . - - 0 t b 4 t C — C l S b $ 1 3 - 3 a 3 4 ‘ 0 I 5 5 0 1 3 F S £ 4 4 . t 3 0 s ’ 1 . 0 0 . 4 0 1 0 1 • I E S j I F s - ) 1 4 4 ‘ 1 C t C r C 1 . U ) L E 4 2 t I L E ‘ . - 0 4 i 2 : t r t I 2 1 p i c 0 1 ( L c 2 £ 2 1 t I t I - i c C 2 t I a i c a c C - t I t I s t I a 0 t I i c t I I U i c v i c 0 p 2 2 2 1 ) - 2 / U L j 7 r 3 i 3 t i - t I j . 2 i c 2 a i c p C c • t I t I p4 t S t I a ) 1 - t I i - S p 2 t I 1 ç - t I I U i c t I i c t I t I < 1 - 2 t I 2j 2 t I C - 2 - 3 t U L ç t I t I t I 0 i c 2 2 3 2 2 7 U t I I t I 2 3 - 3 s P t I ‘ n i 0 D C o 0 a ’ B D C D C D C D C t f a • 2e 0 , a i I L a W w , ’ 0 s ’ c o ’ o B C o w 9 g ’ a I g o a I W I a a I W a § g a a B I W 3 n 1 c 8 t f a o I W 0 — 0 I D C W e 0 W I ’ Z a o a I B t ; i a . a a — , > D C s ; l f o aW I D C D C I ‘ ‘ a a D C ’ a D C a 0 0 8 z , 3 1 o o ) C • i ’ B D C g I W , , % W W B I - i 0 D C w . ’ C X 0 , . , . i W 0 c ’ r 5 ‘ - , , ‘ a I W “ n t f a C ) D C 0 D C ° c a D C S I W a D C 3 1 0 a 0 c B a ’ 0 D C D C : I 1 p i p i t t § § I S a 0 ’ a . I a S .II 1 ¶ CI , c - 9 : 4 - ‘ 3 - 1 C a 4 . . I a 0 ‘ ) C 9 . 0 1 - I - 3 e t a , t a r V - p ‘ 4 t d 4 3 3 . )4 t e e ‘ S 1 ‘ 0 I ( ’ 3 1 3 4 - - 4 b S 3 . 3 . 4 - u 9 . . i 1 • : 0.
3 1 • ‘ 0 ‘ I ( P e e . 3 0 £ . t S £ ’ 7 3 . ’ 3 , I 1 ‘ C I I t o t ‘ 3 1 0 t m Q 0 ‘ 0 = ’ 0 t o I D a o t ‘ a m a I W a . a a a j r f a a t ’ a I 2 W t g w ø ’ 0 0 a W a I - t n a a w = . 0 I - I 8 8 j 4 W O G . ’ Z a 0 0 a 0 n c . 0 q q 0 I -15- respondent spans over a period of four decades and it would not be in the interest of both the petitioner and respondent to litigate on this issue regarding payment of rent and as such this Court is of the considered view that higher officials viz., an official in the rank of Deputy General Manager from petitioner-Bank and an official of the rank of Secretary from the respondent-State could meet, discuss and can arrive at amicable settlement. All endeavors shall be made by both the sides to arrive at a settlement.
With observations, writ petition is allowed. Order passed in M.A.No.9/2005 by the District Judge, Bagalkot
8.2.2007
confirming
11.7.2005 passed by respondent at Annexure-D is hereby quashed and matter is remitted back to respondent for being disposed of in accordance with law after affording the petitioner-Bank an opportunity keeping in mind the observations made herein above. Ordered accordingly. Sd/ JUDGE BS
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
State Bank of India Act.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 07 Feb 2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.