SHOh. S C MAHAMAPP v. KALMAfl

SRI M41 L1KR t’!% C BASAREDL Y I Ff1 C - SRI SAD ‘cHIi S.P.VrJL ALY. FOli Wc & R I 1. NFA u3VrED TN RESPECT OF Ri.’: sRI SHI\ ARAJ P MUDHOL AD\ 0R Rl, R1 7 R 9 ?2 RIR iT’ d’4 .‘ tL_,t s ‘k ‘I A ,j-’, . 1’ 114 ‘...;C.\Ik r %rii’ iYLRLs. DSIEv 2g.....’ “cf’ j-.4çq1, .\ \( 2o 1 I r F )%I r 0 II’ •‘f[ ‘1 1• FE A 7 IN RFAA9SJOS. BETWEEN: cR1 ‘E RFI E ACF MWOR ((C 131 9IFS () \ Al-I WI WI ‘1 E( A ) FTC S l I 290 F3 ,r K R\GHA\ F t\DRA RAC ITYI TJF MNT P f)M\ (1T 1AN(rADIIAR F{OSM(I RI EPRESH R BE DIHAI ADVs AND: IIRI KM MANTE PPA 0 M MIAN T \PF A El Al I YOF MA JOR OC C BE SINFSS K 3 HOSPFT HITVTADC , 80° HRI PRiM AK $ 2 KALMATEPPA A\ALI ACT MAJOR C C B TSINPS R C HC)SPF’K CHITEE ADGI 2 80° STIR KAJWHF KAR MAHANIAl TA ACT MAWR (( A0T1 W$PF IITAA F IRAN KEMP A FACT IS ) 8 O( C ACITRC I I TURK 4Nfl 111 ‘UN! S% R .) 1106PM CAIIIWAIX il) 3O SMI IJAY4I %XMI 3 0 SHILDFM)R il IU P0 R C’ cHEN’%AxIPI 14TUKUDIGI’RISI4 99 sCI. I. It’ 8 SVF4KKAMUMI)F’I w u ‘FERtP1X%I4i (ONtzA flSHF flI GE MAJOR, O( C. HOt 511101 WORK R 0 HOSPH CHITWADGI 7) 809 SM’! SH4NKRAMM4 3 0 MALI IKARJUN CHAVADI Cr1 M iJOR 0CC. HObSk HOLL 301W R 0 CxAD4GKR R4M ROAD ,82101 ‘MI PLRM4Cz4ZsCz3 AOF MAJOR 0CC HOU’3FHOID W )RK R 0 HUBI 1380028 4SHOKMARIHA SMI SbHIBAI a 51.1 ILBAI a F MUOR XA.. nt FI R IA K flxRII3OMMU 4 U HIIRAP%LLI 90 iat z’iai’L-’, I 461

1.)! R 1IRA RI 4 S j( 18 ‘ ‘ \L1 J I {JARTR( )M\I:’c \I1:J I I S72 O () SHRT \AGARAJ \NIL 10 M \R J MAJ)III. KRAPPA SI \GE MAJOR OC C (1111 11 TILl K T{GIR’P( MMA\ IHIL F S 1 I fL kiRLSH ALri HE \iJOR O C L( T R u CFT1TRAPALLI T\LHk I IAGARIHCiMMA\ IiTALL LLT. (4 SHRI D K CIIJDAMB\RNAIR ICE MAJOR (( BLi\LS K 0 CH1’IRAPMII FLLiK HAGARIBOMMAN IH Iii I SHRI K KESHAIMURIHI S 0 PARI ATAGOC DA AGE MAJOR, 0CC 01. SINESS K (. CH1TRAPALLJ AlLEN HACARIBCAIMAClHALLL-5A2 O4 SMT M VASANTI GE IIAJUR U(C: BENi\F Rio CHITRAPIIII I lICK HGRIBOMM\\H I O4 iRi ii IBo CLJITRAIA1LI A T\Li C IA FCi I

10. PAl T K HAOARIBOMMANAHAIL1 2904 2 SHRI K I AXM1ARAYAN AGF MAJOR, 000. l3 SINFSS R 0 CHITRAPAIII I Al C K AGA 71BC MMA A 04 SHRI S GT. R BASA\ ARA GE MAJOR, CX C R 0 C HITRAPAIA 1 PT. ,INEbS ALUK H GARH3OMMANAH ALl 1 , 7 904 SHRI SHRI NARAYATSINGH AGE MAJOR OC R/ 0 (‘HITRAPAI I I PAl UK HAGARIBOMMANAHAI II 37 904 rn SINESS 6 SMT B RIZWIN W1O RIYZ AGE MAJOR, 0CC BUSINESS R/O (HITRAPALLI TALUK HAGARIBOMMANAHAI 11 72904 SMT A MUNNIBEGT. M AGF MAJOR 0CC’ rn SINFSS R 0 CHITRAPAIII TAll K HAGARli3OMMAJ\AHAI I 204 8 HRI MITHALAI ACxF MAJ )R 000 B SI R 0 (HITRAPAI I All IA AR XMM 9 IR A’ ANT. NM I I MA iIAOR A 1K r HIRAA 11 OV VOlT \RE9HH AOl MAJOR, 0CC HOUSI HO H WORK R/0. (HI’IRAPMII T UiK H\O RlB0MM A U-I \I LI 7 I O 4 s u j -Of \TT )R R ‘ALUK II 1ARIH0MMJcAi1A LI 372 04 . (HJTRAp\LL1 SFlRI M OARJ S (3 DEDDS f3I3W1A \GE M kJOR 0CC 131. SFcF 58 R 1) (HILRWAl LI IALUR HAGARIBOMMAN \HALLI- 172 904 0 \-13{uK S 0 M\HM’TAPPA JA\ \LI ME MAJOR. 0CC: BIJSJNESS RU oD\O AND HUSPLTO7 800 C HANNABASAPPA 8/0 MAHANTAPP. JAVLI AGE MAJOR, CCC BC SINESS R/O, CrADO AND IIOSPETO72 809 RFOPO\DE\TS 0-kLLihM N.C 3A0NE0 \D\ R12, R1405 SERVED: R2-6. SRi SADASIII\ S PTIL,ADV k0R R7 10 \k FiLl) I 20 F 3 ‘IF 4H )8 FOR R9 ‘OT t )0E I R13 I RIA 4 01 C S 10 )R RI I -133 Ill) I 1 TO) 13) 34 rij 0:’i 713 T’O U -r r ‘E13 FF1 DO 3V KLMANJUNATH. J. I LI, 12 JUDGMENT Thea appeals art. preferred unsuccessful plaintiffs in 0 ‘3 Is 12612001 Ii 1 of the kdditional Civil Judgc (Sr Dii), Gadag, dated 22 122007 Ihe appellants in RIA No 417 )OOR wn. the plaintiffs 2 nd .3 before the Court below The *ppelMnt in RItA No 495 2008 was the lcpLiintifT r Therefore these two appeals arc taken up the suit together 2 The suit was instituted by the appellants ciattnir & partition and separate posscsaon oi 1’ ei share ii the suit schedu e roperucs ¼ rd r t Ut I ny e I a i 11’ ) 4 . 3 , 1 a 0 , S a > e a a n 0 a a ) . 0 C m a , . . 0 a m c t a ; : a ‘ ; I n i a 0 a a& B Q J I a a 4 l f a B a a 0 t 0 1 a ’ 0 o • i t 1 a B j 0 d ‘4 of M;rhatitppa and after tho deaih of \lahantappa. the plaintiffs have sold seteral joint fainih properties and have n’t nluded all tie prop•crth s ot uiu frnih anC. theref r s filed b he plaintiffs nithout inriuding all family properties 15 maintainable. rherefor, th request the Couit dismiss the appeals 4, Based on the above pleadings, the followinr issues r etc framed b the Court below 1) Whether plaintiffs schedule properties are joint family properbes are m joint possession with defendants No Ito IO’2 ) Whether plantiffs prove that defendant Nos I a d 3 sold the suit r roperties to defendant Nosil to 33 without any ega necessity and behind the back of hem lence. re sa d trar act i a e ‘tot bmdq an then VVhthe ar ton hc. p pe tes between them and e:efcndaot No 10’? a n o n ropsdE a I a t an L ur ar c r flj 1 fl[43 f’ ‘d 13 originally statement Hulligaddi, Kalmathappa bequeathed them to Mahantappa 1607. 1 9..9? belongs the propositus a Will 5) Whether defendant Noi proves that after the death of Mahantappa. the suit properties other than suit A(ii), Eu) and (iii) and B(vii) properties are inherited by his wife and sons? 6) Whether defendant Noi proves that properties mentioned No1(B) (xxvii) of the plaint partnership property of the firm? 7) Whether defendant No.1 proves that the propositus during his lifetime is given the properties to defendant No6 to 10 and they have no share in the suit properties? 8) Whether plaintiffs are entitled to share as prayed in the plaint along with other prayer? ADDITIONAL ISSUES I) Whether plaintiffs schedule IC V to iX properties are in exist and they are entitled for partition in those roerties? that, 16: 3) Whether the suit of the plaintiffs is not maintainable for non-including all joint family properties more particularly the properties shown in schedule A and B produced along with wntten statement of defendant No 1, 4) Whether suit is not tenable for non- joinder of purchase of the family properties shown in schedule A of the written statement of defendant No 19 In order to prove their -ontenuons. ti e plaintiff as examined as PW- I and hc i eh€ d upon Exs.P I to lo. On behalf of the defendants. Klamatappa Jac’ ali. Defendart No 1. as examined as DIV- 1 and also one V Ravrndranatl. (xupta ias examdied as DW2 The; hate :ehed on Exs D 1 ‘o 81 ( TI oçiict C 1 l itt J) ti ttt t’ iS * lSt( C - ui r i ‘ s2 ‘ topilk . N in Thc 1C ‘tC 1

1. ‘Ga 4 ,d ?1.li is, ‘l I cc . e. I if. ,.. ..1 a:

1.nc.atl.ta . ’ - I W g ) C a d I ’4 ’ S a n dO I ‘ & a f i a a o a & a n & 0 t 0 0 ) I ( a a w a a . 9 * 1 . . . i Z 0 8 8 a 0 n a I ‘ a a a a a ‘ 1 . ( ‘ 0 0 0 ) C 0 S D C ) C a . . D C 0 D C 0 o C D C , . 1 0 D C i h . ! D C . . Q o C S D C . D C D C r D C 0 D C r 0 o D C — D C r . D C D C b 0 0 . . D C . D C D C 0 ) C N D C 0 i 0 r o C D C . D C 0 D C D C D C i ( ) C N 0 0 j o D C s ) 2 i C 0 — h T f D C 0 . _ _ _ 0 D C D C ) C ) C . D C ) l C ) . 0 c ) C 5 0 j D C 0 D C . o C o C D C D C c r D C D C D C D C 0 S . D C ) C . , C • D C D C o C z 0 . ) C . - ) l C D C a D C ) C 0 Q D C r D C . D C * r D C ) C 2 o C C ) C o C D C l C D C l C ) C * r o C C D C D C ) = C r D C = C D C 1 5 C C . ) C D C i D C ) C < ) C _ D C C f r ) C • rC D l C D C ) C r - ) C D C i ) C D C i ) C ) C - : ) ) C C l C _ ) C ) C l C D C 1 D C . D . C o C ) C1 C C c ) C + 1r ?C o C C ) C c . Q D C r D C - o < < + r D C r D C ) C 1 - ) P C - ) C D C D C o C D C ) C D C o C D C 0 e Q C l C l C C 0 D C . i c ) N ) N C ) C o C o C D C l C ) C 0 ) l C z p - C N . ‘ ‘ - ( Q 1 ) l C ) ) C C C ) L l C D C D C ) C ) D C o C 1 D C ) C l C . . Z — D C . ) D C ô ) C o C D C C D C o C D C “ D C ) C r — ) C — “ C < D C * r ) C r c C c D C l D C ) C C - o C Q r f ) l C D C j D C o D C o C - ° o C B - ) D E D C l C . 2 2 j ) C C D : : C 4 J ) C c D : C ) C D C . ) C J )o C D C C . r J — ) C ? o C C * r o C . o C l C ) C J t D C D C D C ) C o C D C o . ) C : ) . 2 C o C 2 J L )4 f 1 N i J C L