B. Mainuddin v. Shivaprasad
Judgment
Shivaprasad s/o Subharatnam, Major, owner of the tempo trax Bearing reg. No. KA-36/M-7227, R/o Attack Depot, Manvi, Raichur District. The Manager, M/s Oriental Insurance Co., Dhwaraka 79, N.H. Road, Chennai-600 034, by its Nearest Branch Office, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Station Road, Hospet, Bellary District. [By Shri G.N. Raichur, Advocate for R2) - Respondents • H H — a H I — H _ C — C a C H — C — H L C C C — > L C C H t r a C a L C H H I R a O a C C a I H H - H t r ) I H H C C h — - ) 9 — C1 C S & H — H L C L C a a H — C & a L C a a a I L C H ) 0 9 > O H C C1C O C a I H C H07 C C I 7 H 1 I H a Q C t C 0 : L C a I H . x a c ) 9 0 N O o C H H H C a I H H C t r L C a H 0 ) o 7 H 0 O L C 0 L C i — L 0C C 5 $ ) C C ) 9 C I H — a — a D C j I H H 5 5 a ) I L C a H a i S - t H a L C o — D C H D C ) C 0 0 ) — L C L C r C L C D C C H L C L C ) C a . ) 9 C : C C t r L C ) 9 Q C C C a I C H ) C L C — C C L C ) C C C r C L C . - C r C H - D C — H r ) C C I H H H a — a I H C I — H > a C C I H — a a — a 0 C - I H H r H a I H C — C t t C C C L C . L C C C C L C > C - ‘ a a S t r a C C C L C j C C H C a C a a — C H a a H n a L C C a a a • • m a a C - I H — a t u a — C : L C a a a ‘ 0 I H a a H H r C - a C C ) I H : C a — a L C C L C L C — a H C C C a L C C I H — L C C a L C a 1 9 ) 9 9 — — C C L C I ) 9 H C Ct 5 a D C - ) 9 H r H C L C L C D C H H H D C - C r C ’ Y P a C C . < o . . . L C D C L C < t H . t C C a s — 5 $ a a a a ° C H a s L C a H a ‘ H D C C H — a I a H a C L C a C r I C H & I H ) 9 L C - ) 9 - a - I H — — ) H C I I H H C a D C ) I L L C ) 9 7 C C 5 • C L C • D C 7 - ) C I C H 5 _ _ _ _ t 0 . S D P c D P p : ) C — = a a P P D P 5 ) C r = g 9 a 0 5 t r l f t r P D P p a . t r , — a l E p a a = a o a D P ± r 0 0 i i ) C Ct l E D P 0 D P D P — 0 L C a o . t r 0 t . a o D P t N Q P — P D P t r i D C D P D P a t r : . 0 0 g ) C p - a 0 - E 1 c 0 ) C ’ D P 0 0 0 0 t r D P o 0 0 a D P - D P p - o I F D P ) D P l l E E p l E 0 D P 0 L C a t r 0 0 P S a 0 D P 0 . a D P D P D P a 0 a D P t r o — a t r o — 0 a D P ) t ) t r D P a D P . a ) o C a 0 l tE — t r S a 5 P - — C 5 a a 0 i D P 0 ) C a 1 l E o c a ) C F p ) p - a t r 0 3 — a j o g “ — 0 a 0 . . S E
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.