✦ High Court of India · 15 Mar 2011

Bahubali, 5/0. Hayapal Huppari v. The S tateel Karnataka

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Mar 2011
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Mar 2011
Length
6,481 words

under Section 498-A of IPC, the trial Court found that the evidence of the prosecution witnesses indicated that, the accused had given cruel treatment to the deceased, following which the deceased committed suicide by setting herself on fire. The death of Parbhavati due to burn injuries and the death being suicidal is also a finding recorded by the trial Court. The accused therefore, convicted in respect of offences punishable under Section 498-A of the IPC and they were sentenced as mentioned above.

5. 1 have heard the learned Counsel Sri. K. S. PaW the appellants and Sri. Anand K. Navalgimath, r l A i t D C C X r C D C l ) C A D C l A D C r C D C l A ) l C A l A D0 C r C r ) C l C C D C r C . L D C l C l C r C D C I l A ) C - A — D C - l A A - A C - Q l l C A A - A 0 A D C < D C ) 2 : r C D C l i A C r C D C r C — 2 r C + - r r C D C l A D C D C ) C lC A r l A ) C A A - ) C lA A A CC ) ) • D C ) C ) C D C F C r C D C r r C C - A r C C ) C l C 0 D C - A r l 0C C - A 0 - r C A - A r C D C l C A D C r A C r l A 0 0 r D A C A DC r C D C r C D C l A r r C D 00 C 2 r C DC C l A D C 2 r C D0 C ) C C D C r C r 2 1 ( r D0 C C . r AC ( C ) C D C r C ) C ” - A + r 2 r C ) C r D C I r r C : A ) C . r — C r C r C ) i ) C D C I C D C z ç ) C r C D C ) C + r l A D C D C o o - ) C j r C 0 0 > o r ± r C D C l A r C i c 2 r C ” - A - r C ) ) ) D C l ) A C 0 D C ) C r C r C l - r C r C D C l A ” - A A r C ) . g r C - D C r C . ± + r D C j r C < D C r C ) C D C - ) C - A . r C ‘ D C ± r r C D C D C ) C 0 ) - r A C r D C C ) A D C r C l A D ) r r C D C r C ) C ) A ( r C r j C 2 r C A A r C ) C — 0 D C j - A r r C r C r C D C . r C D — C r D C C ) A I L D C , j r C ) C r r C D C l A D C j r — ) C C l A “ . : ) C ) A r C D C r C D C D C 0 0 A r D C 0 o r — C ) C C C — D C D C r ) C D C r C r ) C r 2 r C C ) C r C r C A D C D C ’ r D C - A - A j ) ) r C — l A l A + r r C D C r C ) ) 2 C b r C D C r l C A r C D C r D C D C D C D C — 4 5 . . r C r C r C D C r C D C o D C ) D C m r r C D C i 2 r C D C - A : r C ) C ) ) ) 0 r C r C D C . ÷ ) C r C r r r - 2 ( 9 C C r i C D C D C ) l C A C ) 7 c r C r 0 C l A , - A r D C i D C - D C $ 2 ) C 1C D ) C C ) C — ) l C D C = ) C D C D C ) ) C C . . d — D C 1 - a - D C O D ) ) C C - D C ) C O D ) l C — ) ; ) : ) C C C C _ c ) ) l C C C ) ) ) C C C ) l C ) C C D C l D C C ) C - D C ) C ) l ) / C C ) C D C ) C D C O D ) C ) C < ’ C D C ) C D C ) l C D C = . . ) l C ) — C n r ) ) C C ’ ) ) C C C D C r ) 9 < = D C r D C — i i C r — ) l C ) a C - ) C ) — C r ) C ) C D C ) t ) C ) l C D C D ) C )— C ’ C . . ’ C D C ) C D C C _ _ _ _ _ 9 C ) ) D C ) D C - n r < * r D C ) C D C D C D C - ± r ) C ) C • . ) C ) ) C C D C D C L 9 D C 9 C D C D C ’ C D C ) C ’ D C C D C D C - ) r C — ) C — . ’ C D C 9 Q t r D C ) j D C D C D C . r D C C 9 r ) C O D ) C D C D D C r r r D C ) ) C C D C ) C ) C ) C D C C - ) C D C ) C D C i Z r ) C ) / C D C ) C ) C D C D C r . . D C ) C — D C — ’ C ) C $ r : + — ) C D C 1 - ) C ) ) C C r ) 9 9 ) C 9 ) C — — R ) C C D C . ) 9 . ) C D C ’ ) l C D C C ) C < D C ) ) l C C 9 ) ) l ) l C C C ) C ) C ) C C ) C r ± r D C D C D C ) / C 1 3 — D C ) 1 9 C ’ ) ) C ) C ) l C ) l C ) C ) ) C ’ C ) C ± r D C D C D C 9 C ) l L c ) ) l C C — ) C . n c D C ) ) C C r ) D C C C ’ C ) C O D r j D C ) C ) C ) n r : ’ C ) l C D C ) C D C t r ) C ) — C < i ) C r ) C 9 ) C + r ) ) C C D C ) C D C ) C ) C D C . . • ) ) C C C D C ) C ’ C D C . 9 — ) l C D C C ’ i c — ) C i — — ) C ) ) l C C D C ) C c 1 c ) ) C C ) / C ) = C ) l C ) C 9 ’ — ) l C D C C D DC S C - OCc D i O D i c i c D S D D1C C D S 1C D D S D C i D c C D C i c ) C C D C- C - t r D S D C i1C D Dc S i c D O C S D D C i c D C h D C O D D C i c ) C i c i c C D C D C C - D C i c D S D S i c c C D C ) l C i c i c ) C D C D S D C D C C i c t - - C D S D C i c O D D C i c i c D S D C O D i c D S D C O D O D i c I - D C ) l C D S D C — ) f ( D C C C i c X ( 4 r f O D i c ) l C O D r i c i c i c Z D C i c i c 0c i D S D D C S C D C D S i c i c O D i c C _ . _ D S C D C D C D C D C i c D S D S i c a C D S i c D C C i c i c i c s - i C D C D C D C 2 o < D S ° . O D D S . D S D C r D S D C t r i c D C D S D C i c D C D C D C i c D i Dc C i c 1 < l I ( D S D C D S $ r D C C r D S D C i c D C O D i c i c D C D C i c i c D C ) l ) l C C D C i c D S D C D C i c O D i Dc C i c ) C i Cc D C o D S • : . , . I - r O D i c q c D C i c C C i c D O D D S < • r ( — i t - t - D C — C i - D C O D D S i c - i c D C D C D C D S + r F D C i c r O D l c C i c O D D S D C i c C ) C o O D o i c i c c D C t - ) C o - r o — — i c D S i c + r C O D D C D S c — i c D C i c D C i c ) C D C O D i c i c D C c / c D C D C D S o i c D ) C c S C D S i c i c i c D S D C i S 9 C D S D S < C i c i c D C D C i c i c D C i i c D C j C i c D S o D S D S D S O D i c j i c i c C i c D i i D C o D C t — ’0 - I ) I 0 W a 0 0 . I W a0 0 a a . i _ I r ‘ 2 1 t a a 0 a D C D C • B a 0 D 0 C 0 D C D C a D C 0 0 0 a n r e W Q D C b0 a m a 0 q - 0 a 0 a ’ a m ’ j a ’ . z ’ 0 1 Dz 2 C ) I 0 W a o t . I W a o ’ a o c a a t DI C 0 B D C a m • 5 Ø b . I W 0 1 t I1 W 0 4 • D C 4 - ‘ D C tW T I 0 1 ) ’ 1 0 o : a o — I o 0 1 D C a ‘ a 0 1 a D C B D C D C a II the deceased to make their unlawful demand or whether the conduct of the accused was such so as to drive the woman to commit suicide.

9. Section 498-A is defines the ‘cruelty’ as follows: “‘Cruelty’ means: a) any wilfhi conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or b) harassment the woman where harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any propefly or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.’

10. To attract the aforesaid clause (a) of the explanation, the prosecution will have to prove that the conduct of the accused was of such a nature that it i C C C C D C D C C C D C D C C C i C D C C - rC D C C C D C D C D C C C ‘ D C D C CCC i D C D C : D C r C— C C C - C C C —C D C C C DC C D C D C C C C . Cg C D C D C C C D C D C D C C C D C D C C C D C 0 D C T C ) 1 D C C C . — C D C D C D C C C j 0 r C C t — D o C C C C C C C D C C C - r D C C C D C 2 D C D C . i C Q f l . q j ç C C C C r D C D C C C C D C D C C C C C D C D C D C . D C C C 0 C C — - C C D C 2 1 D 1 - C C C D C Z D C C D C l f D C D C D C D C . C C C + r C D C C D D C i C D C C D C D C D C a 0 ÷ 0 - ’ V C C C ) C 0 D C D C C C C C D C j l c i D C C C : D C D C D C • s r D C C . . C 1 C C i C C C C Z C — D C 1 C D C 2 D C n r C < l C C D C C D C C — D C D C . D C • C C . C C C C C D C C i D C C C C C C C C C D C D C D C D C D C — Z C — D C D C C I . . C C C r D C C C D C t c : C C C D C C C - D C D C + — C C C . • — ? C r C r C C C C r C C C C - i - C C C t r C C D C D C D C ) i C C 2 D C D C C C D C . h C C C q C C 1 r C D C C C C C C 1 C 7 C c i : C C r C C C C C r C C D C a n m m m m Z “ ‘ -1 c ‘ 8 m E r m 0 0 t 0 — — a a a a a ’ 3 1 0 a 5 0 j a Q a a ’ D ” C ‘ a a 0 a m a a 0 a a • 0 a Z a m 0 m 0 o \ 14 Investigating Officer was not in the handwriting of the deceased Prabhavati and yet after referring to the evidence of PW 17 and taking note of the other documents at M.O.s 17 to 19 and the FSL report at Ex.P2 1, the learned trial Judge has concluded thus at page 39: “Thus taking into account the evidence of PW- 17 and M.O.16 to 19 and Ex.P-20 and 21, it is very much clear that the chit is written by Prabhavathi arid it is in her hand writing and in which she has referred the A-i has god and she has not complaint accused No.1 and this that there was no prior ill-treatment for incident, prior to she committing suicide. The contention the evidence of the PW-1 that the M.O.16 is not written by the is not Prabhavathi as deposed by the PW- I accepted for the reason that, it was seized by the

1.0. on the day conducting the spot panchanama on 14-6-2003 and the admittedly M.O.i7 to 19 are the documents which are earliest to the marriage and the incident, and the opinion given by the _ : L ) ) O C t F ’ a . a C ’ a ’ a ) O C ’ a 9 C ’ a ’ a ’ a ’ a t r - ’ a t F ’ a ’ a t F t ’ a Z t C t F t r t F ’ a ’ a ’ a O C ’ a a C t F t F t F ’ a ’ a ’ a t F C t F C ’ a i - ’ a C v — O C t F a C 0 a C t F t F t F O C ’ a ’ a . 9 O C ’ a 9 ’ a a C D ) — t r t F O C ’ a O C ’ c — — a C C ’ a t F t — F O C a C Z ’ a — C . t F C < a C ’ a ’ a ’ a ’ a — C t F ’ a t F ’ a . C f ’ a C ’ a - ’ a C ’ a < C ’ a a C O C t F 3 C t F ’ a - ’ a — ’ a a C ’ a C a C t F ’ a t F t r ’ a ’ a D C ’ a C ’ a ’ a O C ’ a ’ a O O C C C _ - a I C a i c . C C C t F a C ’ a a C — C - ’ a . - C C i t F t F ’ a t F C t F t ) p t F C C C t F 0 t F . a C O C C C t F a C ’ a ’ a ’ a 9 ’ a a C ’ a a C t F — . a ’ a t r C t F C - ’ a t F t F ’ a O C a t F C ’ a ’ a 9 — . ’ a 0 t F a C — ’ a C ’ a C O C a C ’ a t F ’ a C C - ’ a F t C F “ — C — - t F a C ’ a ’ c ’ a ) C ’ a ’ a ’ a ) ’ a ) 9 O C C O C a C ’ a C : C ( O C ’ a a C C ’ a ’ a t F C ’ a ’ a ’ a C O C ’ a a C ) 9 = O C t F C t F ’ a . ) C 9 ’ a ’ a I ( H ) 9 . . C C ’ a 9 9 C t F ’ a a — C ’ a t F < — C C ) C t F ) ’ a ’ a a C ’ a ’ a 9 O C - 9 a C C a C ’ a ) C 9 a C ’ a O C ’ a t F t F C C ’ a O C t r - ) 9 ’ a ’ a a C ’ a ’ a ’ a O C ’ a ” a ’ a a C t F ’ a r O C C ’ a a C t F 2 5 t F ’ a t F a C ’ a C C ) C t F a c ’ a C t F ) ’ a . ’ a ) C O C ’ a ’ a ’ a ’ a t F t C F C t F ’ a a C ’ a C ’ a C - t F . ’ a t F t 9 F ’ a C ’ a . 1 C ’ a ’ a 3 H ‘ — ’ a ) C ’ a a — C t F a C ’ a r C ( ’ a 9 a C ’ a ’ a ) C I ( . C a t F C t ’ F a O C r C ( t F z - t F . t F a C C t F O C C ) 9 ’ a ’ a . i ’ a C . . a C C C ’ a a r C ’ a O C ) C t F a C . C - a C ) C C C < ‘ ‘ — - O C D C ) C o D C t i ) C ) : 9 r D C D C ) 5 0 5 O C t r $ t r D C S C D C ) D C D C — D C 0 ( + r “ 2 c D C D C ) C 0 5 z , • 0 D C ) C O C 0 5 F t i D C o - 0 - D C D C D C i C < c . - O C * — ) C ( 0 . — - 0 0 t r D C - 0 - 0 $ t r - 2 . - o D C . • O C D C P t r \ l f O C O C - 0 5 D C O C r D C S C S C 0 t r i c : l E * . s O C $ * r D C t r — D C D C D C ) C O C O C t r l C D C D C D C 0 L C i C - . — - 0 O C 5 D C g ; l E 0 D C . L C C r O C D C . . , 0 0 O C D C O C L C 5 0 - - 0 D C O C 0 . D C D C — ) C O C o + r ) C D C D C - 0 n — S O D C S O D C C — t S C O C “ D C 0 ( 5 0 — - g ) C F r D C D C D C ) 9 ) C L C D C C — ) D C D C D C D C — - _ z i C O C D C S C - — 0 i C . . D C L C n D C 0 S C FtH - O 6 t r 0 i D C C O C . ) C D C ) 9 - ) 9 9 D C ) 9 ) 9 0 — g - z D C M O C O C — S C - 0 D C S C — L C D C - o D C - 0 D C * r 0 - 0 0 3 C o : D C l f t ) C t r — o 3 i C — O C D - C S C o 0 5 t r t r — D C - • D C D C D C T I D C • D C D C i C O C D C - 0 t i D C r — 0 ( ) 4 0 i D C ) C 0 5 S C N t n r 0 ) C S C 5 0 _ - 0 0 0 5 D C O C D C D C 0 ( D C D C D C D C r C m l E “ s C ) C r D C t c ) 9 t r : ) C D C D C j D C - o n S C D C ’ i D C I — 0 Z a p e c S E ; ) 0 a 0 m a P1 ’ < a 0 R a 2 a ) ’ C D C a e . i t s d W t f a ( ‘ a 0 0 i i v ’ E a D C ‘ a E a E 0 a ’ 0 g t a p a o o a p a p a 0 1 a 8 • a a p > 0 a t a f a p ’ 0 ’ Z a a 0 0 O ç a t f 0 a t a c a ’ 9 X a ? . O C ’ 0 0 0 ) 0 a p . , S C . t 0 a . a D C 0 ) ’ C P . a p S a p a a a a a a a a a p D C D C — C 1 D C D —C D C D C D C D C D C C D C ) 2 D C D - C . D C L c D C , I L 1 U —

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments