Judgment · High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
q 0 3 . . C I e £ t f - n c • . — - ’ C a e a m 1 f 4J a s a s a , - ) J D C ) C o 4 . 0 ) a I l s t ‘ i C . 0 o D C J T • ) 0 * 1 t - 3 P r : I W W — D C i — a , 9 — I a - . a I i S - 1 . 1 0 ) . P I - & a — — 0 — t I ) P . . I t — i v ) ‘ 3 . . P 5 1 1 0 I L 5 0- a - — 3 1 3 1 3 : L I — a 3 5— : t — - p - p - a D a 0 ( 1 5 1 3 3 : 1 I L i I p 3 : ) X C : - : - 3 : p — 1 0 1 0 ç 3 * a i - 3 : I L 3 - 5 : 3 5 - 3 5 3 1 a 0 - 3 ( lC f / 5 I L 5 : 1 0 L I 1 3 - a a * 5 1 3 : ) 3 ( - 1 0 3 : a 3 ( 0 ( S C I L 3 : 5 : 3 1 5 L I * ) 3 : ) 3 : : 3 ( L I — 5 : a 5 : I L 3 ( - 5 3 : ) C - ) I L ) 3 ( 3 : ) 3 : 5 - a - - L I L I 5 : L I 3 : ( 3 : - I c i c : 3 : - L I I L I 3 : ( I L 1 0 3 : 3 : ) C E S C 1 0 ( L I 1 ( * X I ) i c J - 1 0 3 ( 1 3 E ; L I 5 : 1 E I ( D - 3 : 5 : 3 : 3 : 5 3 : i c P E I L L I 1 - ) 3 : a j S 3 I 3 : ) 1 ) 3 : 1 0 5 : 0 ( 3 : ) 3 : 3 L I L I I 3 : ‘ - 3 : I 3 : 3 : 3 : 3 : 5 3 : ) 3 : 5 : 3 : 3 a 3 ( L I 1 — / — J S - : t 3j : 3 ( t - 3 : * 1 ( 1 9 3 ( 3 ( 3 : 0 - 3 : 3 : 3 : 3 : ( - t 3— ( v ) : 3 : - D I 3 ( - - I ’ 1 3 : 3 : 3 : 3 : — D 1 C 9 0 0 3 : S 3 : C 9 C 3 : 9 3 ( t - 3 ( 9 3 ( ( 3 I i c - r 0j t - 3 ( 3 C 3 ( 3 ( 1 9 3 : 3 b . c - 3 ( t - 3 : 9 - C 3 : ( - 3 : t _ 3 $ 1 ( 3 : - 3 3 : - 3 ( - 0 1 5 3 : 3 : 3 $ / 3 : 3 ( 3 $ C 1 ( ) 3 : 0 3 : I i c — ) C / : C ) C 1 L L C 3 E I ) C i c - — ) C )j 3 C - — ÷ - . I - ) C - — — C C V ) C * I — - I : - C - a — — ) C C c ) C - I7 — i c ) C - - ) C — E - — 1 — j - C — - — - C ) C _ - 7 : : — C C7 C C ) C ( ) C - C- * C 7 C ) C — h C T - , ) JC - - I C - - l f ) C C C ) C ) C ) C ) C C a ) C ) C 7 - ) C ) C - 7 - — L I — - ) C 7 - E -I i’rI ‘L\o. II m,.201,c t: t’ “ ‘%t’ Th’ 2fl0 Ur C W..1 nu oti!’i have çinn ‘S murlc-r and thereb ‘onimittc i an offence p inishabk ‘indet (f’ 1K r 4 11% ic’ 1 r a. gni ante of this Corn. Second1. that ‘)U ,,crused no’,.
the above s;nd date. time and plan’ in turtlwrtnc c I and 2 ‘ni Of VuUI cnnimon intention oluntanh caused hurt to the complainint b3 (Ufl5 of thr’itiu acid on his lice and ned lurh is ned as ;capon of oUt ncc tht ret) c )mmitted offer e punihab1c under Section ‘ ‘ Sec 4 ‘if IPC and aithin the C flEfliZciflt(’ iii tlj’, to’ iii . Thirdh. that ‘.ou at . us’ a rnj5 I an1 2 on the ‘,oe said d.-v. time and p’arr. ‘n fiiitherance cowrno 1 tition ‘as d i t tiic C I’ a’li f C ‘Ii Af’ i’ce r tni’t . rsc C • •• ‘1 • ‘ j ‘-flaria: v.4 j am • ,‘ c tn f•jVt “tee. t.t g— .;‘t’ .9’i In ....,i :‘i .ii:’ ‘(37 •
•‘ •. ,j-n ‘t •;r r’’ — / r — aaCL I I L ( i T C C i L i L L q D ) I L i L — ) I L i L I L C a I IC L _ I L ( I D C CC 1 f a I a L I I L — 2 a — 2 I L c - I L * j C — I L J a - * I L a I L a - - i a — a 9 C 9 a I L ( 9 C a r 9 I - ( - 9 — a * D C i L a i L i C L 9 9 a ) / ( a i L — 2 C j a I L j D a I L D 5 I L C - - - - + - C C j a L Q I — C a i a L 9 C D C a 2 i L ) L I a Z I a j a C C i L I L 3 i — C a C ) I L C C I L a ) - C 2 - i a L z ) C f ( I ( )a I L L L I Q J C - r S - — DCS D ) C - C r D D C 1 D C — 5 I D C : C S C DC C C D C I C j C ) C 5 ) 1 - ) C C D 3 C , D C — C D C C D C r D C — C C r D 1 D — 4 4 A O C ) S C I : C - C - C I D C 5 : C - C C - C ) - C - C C C O C C j : C - - 3 5 - r D — 3 ( I ) I C C * D C C D C - ) C C - - - C - r — D D C j ) C - C C D C - C - C f C - C C C D - Q D C C - C - C C D - C D C C ) - C 9 : C S i C C C - C - 3 C c C I C ) - C - C C C D r D ) 5 D C - C : C r D — H D C S - C — 5 - C - - C C O C - C C - C D C 1 C C t — o ) r D : C 1 ¶ - C : C - C - C i C C - C - C r D C C C 5 r C D - - C C CC D C D C C c C - r D : C + + f C D C C - 1 C S - - 2 . I 5 ) C a Y 1 . t - ‘ ) 0 I - t - ) 0 ç 1 c - I 4 3 . 1 t d $ 3 , - : a 0 - ; “ • D ‘ L ‘ o - 3 . 0 — 3 1 0 1 ( _ a ‘ ) ’ . i r t - D4 0 e a , a I 2 ‘ ; D C B . n - ’ I : C t 0 , . S — : j ; 3 r ‘ ; 4 3 m a 0 1 ’ 4 2 . B t C ? r C ) ’ C C b 0 t - . C , 5 4 b C t m - ‘ ’ 0 3 m a D C t I t - i ‘ . - I ; 0 - 4 - . - 4 ‘ - 5 ) 0 ) , . , C , 5 p a - D C - r i v s a - ‘ a g ‘ . , a , ; g - . 0 / . a t m p _ f B D C o , C ) 0 ’ 0 ) I 0 . S ‘ - I ‘ 7 I 4 i p - ‘ ‘ t 4 t I 4 ‘ a , a q ) 0 C , — . 0 ) C t t 0 ’ z R u , Dg C — — : : ; ! 3 “ r , V D C 0 D C t o j - - ’ 0 * a t I L 8 ‘ - ‘ , C D ‘ - 4 _ a 0 ‘ C y * ‘ ) , C t - 1 ‘ t 1c b • r . a - 3 t - . q o ) 0 0 ‘ 0 ; i - , D C 1 - J I W I • 4 I - : - a p I a a _ 0 % - 0 — 0 ) F ’ r 1 0• ‘ . C ( D C D C 3 . . , , a t - . * t ‘ . Q “ J ‘ . 0 n D ç t D ‘ - a e C t a e Z S t - a i D C ‘ ’ Z “ ‘ — V t , I - 6 a 4 - t I , Z D C 3 - - ü 2 . 0 - - V ) C £ I 3 3 $ F t S a • D C q4 s ! ’ 0 ) 0 ‘ U — a U e C 4 . S ‘ V ) a a C D I c I Ia C V D I I a1 l C a V D - C ) I D L a I I t L a C - - D C D I D ç I I I f I D I i L i L C a - - T I C 1 C I I C L IC 1I D i L f I D I t I . z — D I a V I D C V - V V V ) D I C f I r C V L L I ( c ? V a V D I D I i - ) a V f I D D I I f I r r 1 D1 I i L f i a a - ) a D I C D a C I I ) I a I 1 a Vi D I C I + - - D - I a a - ) - I D I D C i L ( L L I ( t Q - 1 VI D D I ) L V CC i V1 L I D -D I ) I i a C L I ( D I r V C i L f I DI I C I I I L V — i L f C y I C 11 Cr14%oIro’OQ,cw C I k% 1 also prc’ied as P3 1 has stated that the ..c.uscd no 1used tu cnrn to hostel and hc had san him lhc prosecution has titlist U tPW tad lacidbin ijurcsots both duc to splashina of acid In 4cc used no Prosec hon hq dc.n t1iat mjur’cs arc gneous in 8 Nou the question is as to whether the use of acid and splashing or thc. faa of P W as 3ith an intention U murder P W 1 ithcthcr it *ttracts thc prosisions of Section .30/of 9 Fr m th vidcn e kid by hc lrosccutio particula ‘, r refcrcncc thc omplar IxP w nd as c.corlcd t b t Oon r I 3 2(0) P n r t tfr a
4.csc r i I c t ( — i _ I r C , O 4 ? : c c O C i c a < 1 a O C a i c S - D I i c ( i i c a i c C ) ) C R ) C + , 4 i - c i c c c i c - I a 0 i c i c i i c I - i c c C i c 4 i c C / i c / C i c ’ 4 i c i r C - ) C ) C i c - i c i c l C i c C i c i c 0 i D i c D - O C O C i c ( a i D ) i D - i c O C i c c a i c 3 C 0 - i c a C a i — c i c - i9 c - 1 i c r C i D ( i c C i c — , 4 p ) C a ) C C - i c i c ) C r C i c c i c i c i c i D * i c i D i c - i c C O C 3 i D a c a a i c D 1 , 4 i D i a D ( i c i c c r C i c a i c o i c , 4 i c r C i c , 4 / 4 0 4 C i c i c j i c a , 4 i c r C 1 < ) i D a i c c i c i c i D r C i c i c ( , 4 C ) I . i c ’ 4 i D i c i c i D t t— — T C T C 1 T C ) I C t ‘ T C T C CI C - - T C I C I T C T C T C C — T C T C T1 C T C T i C T C T C Z c T T C ) - - T C T C T C T C T C ’ I 1 T C C T C C c t - — J - • I C - - C . I ; C j r T C I ( T C t - - C c C c T C - C C C C 3 C T C T C T C o T C T C o — T C T C T C T C Q c T C T C T C T C T C C c T C T C C L T C T C — — r T C C ) C T — C — jç T j T C — - T C T C T C T C C C H C o: 1 T C T C j T C j L ‘ C - T C C . T - C - C C j Y C f ) ) I C C , C 3 3 1 D C H — DI C D C 3 3 3 3 3 D 3 D 3 D 3 f C D C , 3 D r H — D C D 3 D C D C 3 3 C D 3 ) ) H — 4 — D 3 , 3 - D C 4 ) U CI 3 : - D 3 D C D 3 ) 1 H C f C I H — C ‘ C C 3 3 3 D C D 3 . o D 3 3 3 C I D C 4 - , D C C H D C ) 4 C 4 H 3 3 4 D 3 4 3 3 r - D 3 D C ) C D 3 C 3 3 D C C 3 3 ) H ; 3 3 H 3 D C ) C 3 3 ’ i ( D C , C c l C D 3 3 3 3 D I L D C ) C C D C D 3 4 - - 4 3 3 3 3 D 3 D 3 - D 3 3 3 , 3 - H 3 3 — Q D C ; 3 3 3 3 D C D I D D C * - C 4 D 3 3 I t ’ i - D C D C Q T C 2 1 jC - D C ) C , 3 D 3 D 3 j J ) 1 3 3 D C - 3 D ) C J D C 4 - , 3 D C 4 - D 3 3 3 Q J D 3 3 ç D D C D 3 D 3 D C , 3 . C D 3 j I C D I D C D C I ( d D C D 3 D . 3 3 — D C — 3 , 3 D ) , 3 ) ) 1 3 D C 3 3 ‘ ( j ; : : ’ 3 3 - - C — ) D C ) 3 ) 3 ) 3 D C 3C 3 ) 3 4 r C ) C D C 3 3 - D 4 C — C L C ) C 3 DC3 C f C D C ) 3 - D C D C ) C 1 ( j C C3 3C L I D I1C D C I ( D C - 9 - I 4 D 3 ‘ I( 3 ‘ D C 1 IC 3 ) f C C - 4 3 : I D C D C c ) C D i C 1 5C 9 * - c 1 - - 3 3 ) 3 9 - - C - D C I * I 3 — D C I 9 I ’ f L DC C D C - 4 D C D C D1 C 1 3 - 4 - 4 )- 3 D C 3 3 D C D C - j — ‘ ( - 4 ) C D C D C L C D C - D C I D C ) 3 3 ) C D L C 9 f C D C 3 3 DIC D C DI C D C D C IC D — D C - I D C D C D C D C - 4 D C 1 - D C I I j ) 3 3 3 3 ‘ ( 9 D C 1 D C - 4 I - I D C ) ( r I 3 - 4 - 4 I _ ) C L C 9 J D C 3 3 0 C ) D C C ) 3 3 D C C D C D C D C D C D C D C I 9 — * - 4 D - C D C ) 3 3 D C 3 3 9 D C ) 3 D C D C I - 4 D C 1 9 C - - 9 - ) 3 D C D C L — - 4 ) - I 1 J 4 I ’ C 4 3 = rC 3 c a - s a 4 d W U S ‘ - - V S c b . 4 ) 4 - 4 t C ) ‘ S P l f D C 0 ’ 4 : , I - a 1 1 . - - 4 . D C t t - 0 1 ‘ 0 0 ‘ I I - - . - 0 t - , D C b a D C ) 1 ’ a ’ ! 5 a V D C . 0 ‘ • ) C 1 S P S P a D C ’ 1 S aP I — S P a D C - ‘ I . . ’ T I t I 4 i 1 • D C I L ‘ — D ‘ t - . e C • t f 19 CrLA.No. 1170.2005 c/w CrI.A.No.702.2005 ?1O,000/-. We do not find any reason to interfere with the award of sentence. JUDGE 3UGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 15 Mar 2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.