✦ Karnataka High Court

THE GENTLEMEN’S CLUB, GOKAK v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Writ Petition No. 100767 of 2026LALITHA KANNEGANTI5 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the respondents, this Court is passing the following: ORDER i. The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at all the places of access to…

Judgment

(BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, ADDL. GOVT. ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO INSIST UPON THE PETITIONER OBTAINING A LICENSE FOR THE PLAY OF CAROM, CHESS, RUMMY, ETC., IN ITS PREMISES UNDER THE KARNATAKA POLICE ACT OR THE LICENSING AND CONTROLLING OF PLACES OF PUBLIC AMUSEMENT ORDER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B) GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:2169 WP No. 100767 of 2026 HC-KAR CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following prayer:

a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the Respondents not to insist upon the Petitioner obtaining a license for the play of Carom, Chess, Rummy, etc., in its premises under the Karnataka Police Act or the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusement Order, in the interest of justice and equity. b) Grant such other reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case.

2.

It is the case of the petitioner that, the petitioner is a registered Club which is formed for the purpose of providing entertainment to its members including the equipment and guidance for sports and playing games like carom, chess, rummy, snooker, etc. The games which the petitioner/ Club is conducting are games of strength and do not endanger human life and they are not games of chance. It is the case of the petitioner that, the respondent Nos.3 and 4 are insisting that the petitioner secured a license from the authorities for playing games on the ground with the skill games or games of chance. It is a case of the petitioner - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:2169 WP No. 100767 of 2026 HC-KAR that the police have no authority to interfere with the activities of the Club.

3.

Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the respondent/police are not interfering with the activities of the Club. However, he does not dispute the fact that, in similar cases, this Court and Co-ordinate Benches have passed several orders.

4.

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the respondents, this Court is passing the following: ORDER i. The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein games are played by the members. The CC TV footage of at least prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner, jurisdictional police, as and when called upon to do so. ii. The petitioner shall issue identity cards to all its members, which shall be produced by - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:2169 WP No. 100767 of 2026 HC-KAR members, when called upon by the police, during the raids and surveillance etc. iii. The petitioner shall not allow any non-member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s), to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of game(s) or recreational activities. iv.

The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its members, by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Sections 2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any games of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The members shall not be allowed to play any kind of games with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the games played. v. The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no games are played in any unlawful manner by the members. If jurisdictional police find that game/s played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law. vi. The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any - 6 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:2169 WP No.

Operative part

100767 of 2026 HC-KAR information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises. vii. The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner – Club. viii. It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action accordance with law, if the members of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities. ix. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. x. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI RH CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Karnataka Police Act; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 — s. 2.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 100767 of 2026). ← Search more judgments