✦ High Court of India · 12 Jan 2011

The High Court · 2011

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Jan 2011
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Jan 2011
Length
2,647 words

In 11w Trial Court. the prosretit ion has examined in all 28 witnesces ‘nd Exs.P. 1 in P.5(1 ;tnd M Os. 1 tO ci ere marked. The rleience has not examined any ‘iflu s, but t il ‘d flit statement cA W 1 as Es Dl and I)) I lit I fldl C s of I V ‘SC Ut thu. c F a omplunt wrsc ii V r )kfl1) f i in ilk. ‘4E,iihk. tI—\ t rn;11w,tI II”) ‘1

11.1 .(_ bj e. ‘ i ç • 1t%1 ilir’ I cr1 k.\’,.45t)/20f” at r u.ecl No 1 1 itLirani and tic etised n 5 Sinul %1aI at ii (t • at. In’ Qi S inItiall ‘K w ‘ nd c th t•r ( ‘1 M ‘U in a oiiI viic it P v.i •Jikka”va .1it ri’ the ItsCiiC ‘fi (ianapati Munje she va a1.o a’..%.uiked and no turiher ? C % l ildi e ‘ 1 £)flC awl she Iwccune iiit on c K us TI % c, I s lu’’ 1’ at the object of the iu’lawfnl a%eruhIv wa univ to do aiwav wi h thc life ot •Ierea%ed (xarlapatl Misij and ot to do ‘fl i t ‘f ‘c ., Fil crtal o idntki,zw a1 i e. nt ‘i dc i to i i .i’, LI I I %.%ti lily j 4 nrecj tI:nt liz — hr 1i1nd’ lit t)’.tt io k e -, C) 1 “M 19 hit !:‘:al .4 P • ! iccic hfli .: ‘1 ‘ n I ‘ ci ‘u 4 I i n Ix ‘ • n i a%4 hjlt -‘au:. tJ ‘is luff I ,ti: let ii ;“I’ •!i(I ••‘ .it::’g.’ i ,.‘t’w ••• ;_..I C i C OS Ii ottl ircnro (IJ( tcfll il C ii’ ia.id I c;arialkni Mmqe PI1)%f ( Utiflil alt; t %tL’bli’lit(l that in .url inndt’ni I-’ V. I •Jaklvuvw” ha’ titai’icd Qfl(’ na i ‘iju it. heii ‘H ,‘ent •o the ri< u of C i I t ( t a Ic I to C h t flecon ilol bj ‘tof lit uiFnlu a ,€ it ‘i5t k 1 P.W. I .Jakkawwa. 1 he pro’enitlon lla% also tailed to I)rIne that accused attenipted to commit the murder of P ti -.Jakka’ era. But the prosecution hds sun ssftilb - dl s e t ‘1 % 4 a i. ‘a I ic c at c ç e )i. ires oP. Jkkiw: it’ ‘ eionh, Ic e’-tahltsht’d tl.a’ an used Nc”.. 1 t’ , lornieC themsti “s into an uin1avfuI assembl with ih, Cflflifl1lJi1 object ot m..i’iej’ .g a.iap it. YTun,c .jfldi 11.ai n pi (.St’L unon of h a oil t ‘“tail , Ftll’x ii a • a a. mI ii’’1 “%t’Oi’I) ud p )r St I Li a j I • t)tflflh...1 (.I.H ‘ 1 ,i’ s •Il1 ( ))..‘ •. • ..•c.i . , •1.ci • l’:1. “.; .w4 si’‘ (str)a’tnt’11.3t1R-T’si (10.u iJ) ‘3 C Ii l4iq IIdi111 !L1lJd\ ‘tIfl1qIS%U4’3f1f•tArl1)1‘ 41 I1JLaI (,,pasn)3l’P.)i.)1.1t10.)1.1110) 1n’LU,ce9 I’$.fliit! ‘.aaiiajjOatpJojluinScr°pa%nnt’purPUUfldPdro 1)tU ½01;a“ pput9Z;ti7f rjj.a113 ‘JOf U..t)1 .1J( idI10LOt101)i%.IapuIt ‘10LAL04J MIJo11011i10T).tiSsapirnaauajjoaqi1090NJ’fl1.)3U C) 4paiutWig.., T°\pano‘niesMfl lpzmxt.dcTvIJrNLIRILJXTfl jA$$fl.nipue BUI1SC0\ ‘34p1w4)’3u18N jn.wldru”r.is3iuct!11\ ti, jlThLthLL., )iddv U‘Ui1kLoor,’ro’’ Eit’)‘IL ).Tn’0C’ flI’)(Il1)Iii .) 1111) 1 1 A • C ) •a.‘) s—‘,‘uD1’is’q.: Ti 11F””!‘‘-‘j1.,r in4•,.i) £.—. t’(Pp..)‘i’)_ftl)t1111.11!3U.1%(’ a ‘Wi p)!(Upm. ‘ i•‘‘I A 15OS W th Ia 1’. uii . I sono hi dece’asr l: th’th P.W (i iiad 1 1 were flOt tin InJtred U c P 1 v o mpnnanre. as 4w had ‘—iifftrctl liii. injuries ‘-bout. In xP ? It 4r a dt injuries (‘uuld b caused b M.Os. 1 to 3. The names of W. a I a Ji c p1 3 is 33 P.W 1 The linching evidens’e of P Ws. 1 6 .tnd 1 1 vt dl pipl cc vhca is an it aslu eon%1i ci it eiion that a’ euscrl fls. 1. 2 and 3 ss he dec se s t ii’ i t,t WIii clTi’J i1’ rvaa:d% .u’r’iced N” 4 -md . th”v wvrr tk ; ‘,e t t ec he ‘ t •9’i then iiani’ u- n’ 1n1 irentlGnnl rir’iQi r’w part h; e ‘. erp itt ‘. :1 —“I Ic t’!a )‘t • ‘: V. fleç 11a ‘4— -$ C) )( i ‘It •‘ i.t. i ‘-: i -ti. 1•.q’ ;j. - i I -in i;4c 1. ‘l•t,. . iii F C- ) I I ( rJ \.Nc’43)’2’)O’ ) r idunt’e of iiwt nniusses. de%pit t’ I he taut that t hu I C lflt( rCStt d. Iii’s C cult, ctlSfl obt fl ( (1 that tii iiijiitt’d (1.)’ r I i i t. I Ii a r M ‘C ‘1 fid I ‘ii .t r wìs 31 hc oiin )r tiatas e aris c ii s inc 3 thc’i c w’ts ample material plated on rectrd to p1 on. th ‘fr / Un Co i ils 3t c ‘td h 31 at ‘‘used N’ S ‘is not mentiont ii in hi. cciii )la lit Hc was not kiiown in P.W’. 1. 6 rcl II c-arller Lb the inndenr As regards the identin of th¼. wcused tI’• p fl’d—C’i itiun rdft’ ‘d ‘ipot! the evick’i ‘n- ; ‘1 P.W. 25 the Ir ii a :xccuti ‘ Macis yri e ‘1i ivld tie’ idcnn.ir. ,cjn e ‘ ., a I i ‘,it it(fl .. Lit’ I_I ‘ 1 ‘:iu - r ht i, 1 t it Iv

1., ii’, t. i i I’ t z :‘j9( ci I’, rl c I ttiit I t c Wa - . r 1)tJ’j, IIgil. : • tI”i I i. .. •: • • q I C rI N”.4301 (Hi! deniffic at mi n’ ant ci a’xiui 13 in 13 u’ r% The c a i-n H’ ,t1 (iI(JN ) ; ii ie ‘omphii”t lead ‘ht (‘.,t irt p. ‘hi tk the vt’ anin ci Ti Cd. r I )t I that u would he unsatè to i-eli upon the idenriiIc’ation p A -d , s o ttapjl I ni th appellant No 2 (at ru’ed ‘o.5J for the o1knee Sc ioz 3O r ‘ad ‘Ith eet ii 149 II C. t t ‘Sn’ sed he ppeal of apell it c 1 IA ruse I No 1) confirrninp the tc’in’Ic tgg Lw the offen’ e t’ nder Sc coon )2 h 4? t F )peal Is ‘dr ‘ci a ue N ap I L Mail j)hJh ‘Pt N . r’1l Ii 1 -d -ii • c Cl L ‘ s 111 Ii a it1 “a •‘fl -‘ P tatI itici ‘LU ala iflr’i(U ‘pC tic (I ‘ic C 11 i(’ Ii 1% lilt rnht-nhi’ni at t’it ieanit—d ccvJlI%e1 1n th ;q.fllniar]a ‘bat iliac :‘. rio motv mi aiit’j.$ ci 4 1 t S •j 1 ot tlit tlccrise’i aid ii ere j% ill) ret c’y mad 1 th instance (if an used No.3. therdbn. atom Kilo t cit - loin t appeal 1 I c’. ne I ‘itt Publi Pr ‘e lit I sib it’ iii irnr’ icipattOri :uicl presenc e aCt used No.I s bI,Ii ii- (2(1 id ft r id nc . . id h e air, ot e g,r CC liT ‘,S 11 )i Ii c. “r t 11 rb ‘Cc ‘.1 St (I t ;wln’lpatt Mi itije -sjc h.IiIlLc liii’ it —a IatL’)11½1a1. uti T S J uk id ciii it ‘r( dsp at “ii i I I’ 0 IC ‘ 11 I j ) ‘I • ‘C I. I i • ii. 141% 1 • i.’’IV ‘J? r41 Tel. . .1 I ‘rj’ . ‘! b

1.: •i • 4 I I I I. S I AA 50’.. Sn I’ t t t a S She %:is rcictiiu. in tl;t’ larm lint i1llated In he-i wn’i lit r husb itid C W. 1 7 md Itch hildr ii C. 4 & ). IC 1C (I( I ar pali I conic ,o her land for plougltint. 1k was at ( ompanled C ii lie r 230 the late of the nc-Ide ni lit husband was no. In toe farm hut. Herstlf. C.Ws.9 to 12. C VsAs and 19 were p e 12 n, . ‘p ii cloths inside their hut. At about 2.3u p.m. an wcd \o aim will two other b’ r .ikar 1 Ko ‘ir S l’ cU to i-h ar cl troT’ mdc She .‘oiild deiitiI at i used No.5 SntJ who (‘S N f in. to 1 er Luw ‘1) • ‘t.t cia. 4 tI..t r. NJ. i;;e’j It . - :‘.. • ‘ nIle Is’li Nituip .1, ii ‘l o 1 h 1 i ..rlXifl Ii t.ba £• ‘ij .‘ iij. . •, 1ii.._ 1i’ ialli ‘.li - r- ii. .%.)). f ) 1 1 t\f 1 ii ‘It e ( 19 t’ 1 irl.% \n 4,U,2t)OM 1 tori on Ins Iu. ad. n’11%ecI Nc, 2 SnrnanIn& pk’r’ed tEe )l t t i i lem ni r W 15 Tip ait na Ki ni i lit It u ‘r i I1’en ;wc’u%ed \c’s I and 2 role! not tn bitt ntnv anti uttt red \cli aria can nai and he left the spot. ihen. rataNa tt%slulwd dci eased Ganapiti on h iii db m Wth u-c i rod Accused No.5 Suinil ‘p.qau1ed den’a%eeI Ganai’atl on his tijit leg anks ana accused l%o.4 Thikanun S I’ at,h I ‘n c dSI is ent ‘ci re, ue ..tcrned Can ipiti u that a: C u’ed ?o. 1 -Lacman assatahed lit r ni thr left an kit 1 izit hi ire i rod lht ie tile r it’ nseo N 1 iscaul.ec lu - t 1 S ) En 4%_I TI nL.Ji i; •t’ eta 1, i ie Xliik ‘p1 Nuiita,pa ‘ ‘:i’ ‘—ssuiae ii Ii’ — w.:I; ‘i .‘ ‘u’• “u hu 1 1(1

3. a 1’il ‘31 “) 5( h tt .._‘iii 1 ‘.fl’ it.. tre. ( I ‘ ‘ It • .1 i. (;t’1L . I. ; - I I Cr1 a’ Nø.450 ‘2tXIb .1I• ;tt1i inn rod’ a1id %t1utt d shoutlne at the den.asec and thn 1. ft the i.lace. 13 P W 1 •Jakkaw in her idt t ek1l uit°,, 11 lif I C ‘ ftaC ice hat arc n’ed No :3 Pap )111’j ‘A 1’i11i p’ Ningippa jjratti t 1 ii 111(1 cnsiultt(l ii t dtc east I ht mean’, ol i, ii n)dq. rhia (V dericc ott i s i 1 r - r ri T nughi ‘ 1 was noss ‘is s ci eaminc’d at ienetli ictiune Is ehiciti d to aisbeiie c her ‘uat-n c Sin btin. an njurcd eye rums- Ic \ ict likeb ft mipllnw the nc .i%cd Øounds. lii.’ Tr’aI Court his o flirt ‘d the aece sel Is the fthnc t nj har c uler S ci n 302 h’( i ‘ crctiu it Bench : thi” C o i i ii’ usc rb’t c4 Ui i a -inc .r’ it the ft. ti1 Jkti fl i i_ r ‘1 \ r Ic 1_4i ii i. n d h’ v itci \ 9 iii’ piii i; at; ‘i :1 .IJ( w1 fla 1 t_ ‘f III I.’ ‘ 1TIC) 1: jI1 ‘1e ((( l’h( gidc’i(t 1ij)’i-C ‘i- . l1,j,,e%’h’ I’ ‘ai;’ Cr. Nil ( ‘(Kh I, R r I ii t ii of P.% 1. Uric by •iiIs ac’ i!SL’cl 1’iij tht. i oh pln e I by tcc used Nos 1 aid 2 art mfla . i ole played ‘. 31’ . Ilk t.udng of 1w Hal C nun is I _i uund aid propr ‘rid ii s s tic 1 C ill for in ci iereiwc’ ‘it this stage.

14. In flit n suit, w pass he h;1ioIng. ORDER Appeal s di.. missed. In view O dsai1ssii of di — a qeai I AN S an Is l-si ;s( Sr I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments