SR1 v. I a

octend8” No 2/ Subhas d Defendant are the tao ehildr born to(1jg\i a through LaXm oefrndt Nos 3 to are the cniIdr hot” to sangapN ceho a as the deiendt 5 keeo’ daiS to the plaint avernfltS after the death 0 Ning8PPa ad Ot;tendam No I ,sangappa a re entitled to equ& tarc and that d dee ndait’ 2 S trW are cnh to auual shar0 cut nt the hafi snare Ct Larrinarn n hr dote tht an a ded > ieri ad’? pant.t1 (Aid 3eta e’ ,o )4 ? eu ,tare F the doferdar s C) to tel n rurd It he. i i t ma tai te o S r a parttir I iirg h hfotr of S r’apo Laxmrniitbcoar 9 8 md the j ant tarnil pr pert es cc did icfrlundcr r i ra1 j arti a l oF m m d r roducod intc writing as Momor m idum of Oral Part tior ri pa ii hoof r to It F U 15 lot maintain rblc I he 2 Icfondan do I F t heplainff 01 Iefordmnr N 8 o fegitir i ito hildr on a ira1 Ferefor h I v[t N 8 e e [a Fe i e of C h I I the Joint Hindu Famd, and ultivating suit lands and defendant No I used Ic provide for the maintenance of the family of plaintiffs a’ contended in pamt of the plair’t till) Whether plaintiffs prove genealogy shown along with schedule A annexed with the Dlaint (iv) Whether plaintiffs prove that the suit schedule B & C properties are the joint family deceased Laxman deceased Ningappa and defendant No 1. so the plaintiffs are entitled to 16 share n the suit schedule B & C properties? properties belonging (v) Whether defendants prove that suit of plaintiff in the present form is not maintainable since the plaintiffs have not hallenged th partitior effected in 1978 betweer’ Ningappa Sangappa and Laxmar’. as contended para2of the vrtter statenert (vi Whether defendants prove that plaintiffs nave no rause of action to fiethc. pie c. ts I, iv.. v’:liether the ,lapitifts are entit’ed or oart’ticn and separate uosspsslor of uL L€3 sr erth n’ 1,hato.der r de’-ee . a 9 — 0 4 C t a , C ) . , 4 ’ 4 ? a ‘ ? 4 ) U t a 3 1 i C i C - T • t i c F b 4 b , a _ 1 ‘ - F 4 0 i 1 P O Q ) a ( 1 t a 3 1 4 $ 1 1 ‘ 1 I L 4 1 4 7 - .1 1 ’ 1 1 ‘ C 4 3 P ‘ 4 J 1 d 0 3 z , , a S I / o a . C ) 0 S P - 4 . I 3 , U ‘ 1 . I t p • o t D C D C i i D C 4 L C D C L C L C L C D C n e D C t r 0 t P L C D C 2 0 D C D C t P L C C D C D C C t P D C r n e - [ t P L C 5 L C C O T ( t P $ P t t P L C D C ’ t D C C ‘ t C P D C t r — 4 n n e D C n e p p ‘ . . . > 9 D C L C 9 ) 2 0 t P o t P L C D C C C - t j + r — t t r L C D C D C D C n e t D ‘ C P $ t r o C C 9 ) 0 i L D C C C t — P r f i L L C . t D C C C ‘ ‘ D C Q t P t P D C 9 A V ‘ I - S . i C . i L P L C D C D C - n e ‘ D C L C D C C L C D C * D C C L C t P P P L C 0 1 D C C C t P 0 D C D C 9 L C P Ct D C n e L C L C D C D C t P i L D C D C C C D C L C D C ’ A w - 9 p n e P L C L C g L C D C t - , 3 9 C C D C L C D C D C C n e D C . — Q D C t P ’ n e ‘ D C L C 9 C t r C i D C C C p p i L L C t P t P p L C D C n e . p p . 9 D C D C C C . C D C C t P D C C L C L C t P D C D C 9 P C ) C C C C L C D C C i ’ E I < > L C t L C . . ‘ - D C C i “ 0 C D C i n e I S 0 0 ‘ D C 9 9 L C L p C p n e t P 5 D C 2 6 C — 0 L C D C 9 L C t P L C D C L C D C L C C 2 0 4 C n e t P C C D C C L C t P L C D C j t . t P S t P P C t P ) p k r ) C — X C C C D C C n p e - 9 9 C . ) t p t L C L C C D C r n e C C t P D C r D C A P D C i L n D C C D C C p t P n e D C L C L C D C I S : _ . p L C t r D C Q n e n e C 5 5 ) C D C D C t P D C t r C ‘ t r L C C C C 9 D C : X C L C D C D C ) . C . X C L C L C D C C C L C t r L C C L C D C D C — D C j D C n e e t P L C D C 4 5 D C D C C D C 2 0 C C t P t P C r t c p . D C L C D C C . t P p 0 d S p D C D C D C . , 9 D C L C D C D C D C C C t P t P : D C . l f o * r P c t P L C • D C C L C t < V t P — n e P o L C D C . 9 D C D C L C n e L n e 9 4 p 3 9 . C D C . I - ‘ 0 t f a D C ) C a j • i i i I . 0 t f . ; a I W a D C 8 t a a a a q0 D C , s I - I ’ 8 W I 0 I D C b E 0 E • - t O b t i i • ‘ . 0 r II .IaI a a I 0 ‘ ’ a 4 3 S 9 ac ; F — ; a D C ) 3 3 a‘ —a0 . - * • j • a j r 0 ‘ 3 Z 1 . , . t3 a cC c i I a I i r f , I I ) 0 * S S d ’ - 1 £ d 3 ) .4 S 0 , 3 ‘ 4 3 3 - a ) 0 ) 0 i c a e G 3 3 D C P D C t I ( • t - ‘ I ? - 3 - I ç 3 4 a 4 3 b — P b - 3 3 *I a C 1 47 ; 4 ) a ‘ a p1 C . 4 - ) N ’ a o g — i S 0 C ’ a a a a ’ a a i S 0 a a * r r E 0 ) à ’ a . : 0 ’ a p o g C i S ’ a ’ a ’ a ) t C ’ a a ’ a C ) C o g o m ’ a . t I y — ’ a a i S a C i S ’ a a . . . o g ’ a ’ a o g ’ a e ’ a ) C C ( . . ; . < ’ a 0 . & a ’ a I S ’ a o g 0 a ) T C i S ’ a a o g ’ a ’ a , 0 ’ a i S — — ’ a 4 C ) a C ’ a ’ . a . a ’ a . 9 0 0 . a ’ a I $ ’ a ’ a t ’ a z 3 - ’ a L a t ) 2 5 Q t . ’ a z g ’ a ’ a q ’ a ’ a - t r ’ a 1 5 5 i S C • 0 2 2 < a ’ a ’ a — a ’ a i i ’ a i s ’ a ’ a ’ a o g ’ a 0 ’ a j — a - ’ a j g 0 • ’ a r E 0 a o C ’ a a $ 9 - i S ‘ — i S t ’ a a ’ a ’ a l f l E t w & C t r ‘ — i S t r ’ a ) l C a ’ a i S ’ a 0 ’ a a 1 C . o g 0 i S n . i c ) 0 • 9 C i S 9 i S ’ ‘ — a — i i S S — o g ’ a . — 9 , C c ’ a a — a a ’ a ) T C ’ a ’ a ’ a r E ’ a ’ a ’ a < ’ a i 5 — i S j C t o c ’ a ’ a ’ a a ’ a 0 — ’ a a — o g — o ’ a i S ’ a r E ’ a a o g a , C — ? l C a ’ a . ; o g & a ’ a ( . ’ a ’ a r ) 0 m t C i a o g — t i f i + r ’ a i S ’ a a a a a i S 9 ’ a ? $ s ) C o g I ( a a 2 ’ a ’ a ’ a , ’ a ç ) S 9 9 ’ a a o a ’ a ’ a h t ’ a r E $ [ g0 ’ a ’ a ’ a t r 4 % 4 ) 0 c a a ’ a f o g . > . n — . ’ I — C ’ a a o . — ’ a a t i F j 5 ) 0 * 0 j ‘ $ a ’ a 0 ’ a s ‘3. there is a partitiOfl during the life time 01 taxtuNi prior to the alleged marrW<’ of 1’ iuntiff utb him tilt plain’:ffs carn0 attack the partitWfl tcnn fout ear’ after the partitiOfl. When inafl has not jisputed the earlier partitiOt. whet’ his son defefldallt No.2/S is5upportm the partitioa it is difficult of us to revel it the flndiilP of the trial court mertfofl’ ve are vie that Ex.D 1 rehed upon hi the defend5t’ has tO be accepteMfl vie’b of the Mem0Itn Of PartitOfl. in tht absence of pleadinP and eviden that thele is an inequitable partition and that the saint has been Sfected b p1auk fraud on 1.atfl this Court cannot re open the partition of jg78. therefore, tHa Court annot see any reason to revet’t .be said find ngs % ta as tae 4kjtflfllt cf fl1 ,hitre i’ conL.erned. th- °‘ deletd0t has centended that di pLufltslt I to 3 are not born totan “ft c docuMtnts ro4uc” l tbt. ii *cl. 4 eal tat t in arC the 14 rep horn to Lxmtn Lx tfl if thux -ito consdtrd to be ii1egitnn te huldren hit) ne untied fir &o al Jt3it ol; octiE XtLI Ut;el Lctic LV,’ )

18. in the circumsrances ixe are of xiii piroon ‘hat xli In dlnb f th t1i ii tl a Fl in ff5 t are the children born to T axtrar cannot he disputed But the trial (ourt has comp-utted an error iP not onsider n& thc r 1 xnonsh p 1 ct x a d and ga Defendants They are born to Laxrnan through eeond wife an first xxife respicti ek if it s so. then re nti led for °qu ‘I uw fr ng x it p am 1 3 and defendant No Therefore a are or the 1eV Vat K i 1 i a I pia;r uffs o defer ljr Ti: r ticfrt1dirr \;,5 a Jec - a tTar ot S 1 1 ‘ sn1re t ’ . a J I I a ’ 4 D C : 4 I ) 0 3 a ‘ D C 0 • ) 0 a c 3 w 1 f C L o C aa1 - p a D C 1 . a ‘ D q t a m 3 3 a 1 . a m ’ C 0 5 ‘ 1 I 1 • ; 4 ) ç 3 I ’ I3 a , 1 I 1 3 C ’ ) 0 C , I - I r J ; K ’ s ’ i