Karnataka Circuit Bench High Court · 2011

(By Sri. Unman T. Mantagani, Advocate for Ri Sri. S.G.Kadadakatti, Advocate for R2 Sri. B. Chidananda, Advocate for R3 R4-served) This RFA is filed u/s 96(1) of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 04.08.2005 passed in O.S.No.397/2003 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dnt), Bellary, decreeing the suit for specific performance of contract. This petition coming on for final hearing this day, H.N.Nagamohan Das, J., delivered the following: JUDGMENT This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 04.08.2005 in 0.S.397/2003 passed by Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bellary, decreeing the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale.

2. Appellants are the defendants No.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are the defendant Nos. 3, 7 and 8 before the trial court. In this judgment for convenience the parties are referred to their status before the trial court. r 4 3 1 istht cisc ith Plantiftlat hccncrd t igrci’TrI f ik t’i 1 ckndrts t(’ (U 1 Cc n iih I I I ?t t,lt’ flU Si t)t IISX((fl T cp 1• cor1tcnds th i on differen d au s slit has paid a al a sun I 110 00.000 b i r N ‘0(2 ti inotht. r n gisic rc d tgrc cmc at ol saic for thc. purpose of uc ttin° scnic ( it s ior fr n Kirnit k Slit linan t (crçr from thom hc dcftndants liiw on ed IC n ‘r scc.urlt3 t the s tpropcrtv 1’ tr1 net’m Itt a°iccmci Ca ,ilc th plnrt’ Ia ja’ 4? ((00 id hcc ft. *rhcrun 11) 11 c k itff p11 5 IC ?1IM000 t tcleli s rtcr ‘ I C. CL I 1 a I dtftndants ir ml iecnering rt.nts from tti tc.naIlt% ‘whc dC ii 1)1 L upatinn ot phant srhed tie nr.pt’n; Thereatrer tiji- r’€ILnrtIt ‘tti’n ‘cit ‘1 ‘ia * ‘ ‘icl.t:”’ a ‘ cpt c r’dcici r x utc cgistcrcisal lcd Prii’ tc plaintiff got issued a l.nner notice on 04.08 2O(3 eallinc upot rb rh fr.iitj•,nis t’’ prrtnrni tN—zr ot nbligan.u: ii: t : ms ::I thc first agn wit in. of saic incc thc .k.fendant s failed to ompls thc demand m ide in the Lav3u noflu intl hi ‘rig n other alternatne the plaintiff filed a suit in 1, S..3’7 2Ohi. br pet’i f11 pt’riormanc ni agret-inctit of sale. 4 Btfore flit ti ial Ufl dc fendart ‘los. nd Ec r:ste!rj q’penzan r and tiled ‘Pt ir tt ntwti staernrtit thu I a;iij .edqvu:nc :11w tirst ir—-n nt ‘I salr rtarrrl “, .,‘‘.2’io.’ •.,.f S ass’. U I (3 1 ‘hut’ i r t .. iJ .‘ i 1 gi nOu n ip :h ‘‘,j.’: nS jial .r • •fr.”.’4 1 r ‘flt U • r’ ‘ ) Ii i’s’ Ii di’ • i•.” ‘ “ _:—. •• •,. • ‘••T 4 . . S I, in U nd that thc plaintiff F as not n.ud thc balunc c aji...iiad. coiisiikr ninn md shc ias i a reid’s i ci u’ tHin ix petit i ,ik. I’ r l1irt ? t’i’ilg.tri.:* t)j; ia — i it i.d.s.i \t,—. •t.•ta S ‘n “n. J ‘hr lain .,; p!.iir:V [kit zad 41 t \ ‘S _f 1•, It expartc below the trial court Or f ‘ i I rk I ‘ 1k ir I .n the Ic ‘Ii’s hit issues br its C onstdcrauor I L4lwthe, rise plain nfl pron€t. dater’ 24 ()9 Jt’02 raid 2C 12 2002 iflj ‘lit’ ctaiecrnc s’ti ti’— defenawii passing oj port considEration of Z14 (OO( JAhcthtr ric I is propt y s’ulaJ a )4 “nufl_tct• icad zs tar. Lt? Lj1itizc’r tl’E- j).rI’tiflfj - il”:fltk’tI ‘(sr ‘1w-’ trii.pjt, rl,zri’.ecF 4 111 £(7&F r q Mc — -is P \ P. 1’ t% —‘ .‘.-.l .r•- : ,K’ • • ii ‘i’ rt--.;4’ is’ r’!•::cc 1. ‘ ‘ C ,t’’fl’ — .0 itt • I) I — I I •a j I. ‘C t I. ‘‘ .‘ I )t lip K pci1c.nc of ti ippci us o t b’ ida i d t J))O in c .i s l4ltrc j nrtiJ zij ii pciform htr part of cort,act 8 Or it iditi r 1 IC tti t ft a r I. icc xci idditioi i udcnc r md pitt c )rdll gi jsi tics tier cc trii.1 court Ihc trial ourt itlO 0 mtcra1 ii’ d fr1 tIC. plait If “Is r .i.i ‘ i’l C C xrforr ic oa ) b’i ilf. d C. )(1 0 ra cit a ) 11 g 1 1 1 1 fC 1• Shwakv ar hanra V .Sa zffiost Ku ,ar (200? 8) 6CC 600 ‘I fl nio hied b ‘lit c ‘I ro nist I. it ‘Dpc Hi ‘it C r St ng ‘‘I tin. iq’ti S it’. n. F. 9 •.: irqIi.t ( • (,.e%. 4 ‘aS .1t. .li .‘J •‘flCr!,’l ilii’ iTt t a’ ,,lj:’ €fluLflI’2r(i a trt’t ii’ :.‘‘i JC iflt * finding nit sen,nd agrremenr üí silt dctttd 2”. 12 211ti2 Ii s .‘nttndt l that :1 t ‘thai tf’LlI’ nnin’r’t d _in ;lit Lulit; Ui not appi’ ing its rr ‘nd and o iiig linding undc r ‘tx lion 20 of pt.cilic R lid ½ t ‘ ontc dcd Fat h tiLil c t ozrmittel a mistake ii nct cnsidtr n° tin. pit idirgs ti-c arlicr suit in C) S i 6 2(X’J ciT d inanc in if t p1csrnt pleaclinizs I 16 ilso “t it nded th ‘.s a’ bad r. n :akint inn’ • oris detail’ )fl tile ‘.nl lit flaW’ ml :‘. tihit’lt • ‘‘ ‘.rd R.—!i.tn. c plaet-d on s€qit ije. is’’n—, i I Pr nrTa. !earncq •‘ia! .%t

1.;i ‘1’— 1iji .. tfltt r.i.€’ ‘L iii i: 3b1 It it’ •‘t • . . Jf.J) ‘I t1:t •‘...‘:‘ a’.’ ? I r 12’ tIlcil £ ‘)t ‘iii lilt ( • •L Lii. r I a •t, C (1 ‘t’c1 1, — t. ‘ I •. I • .‘ h’ .. I iiuure •1 httildiiicz ri,aht1 uitr1uclrcl that the drin’danis Ii nr .tgterel 1’’ s. V ‘ht - n!’r’ pteliflt St iLr’tlit pI’ipt•113 .. i’;tiaitiii ,. ;hc. tir. ...,i...t fln_flt .1 alt duttil S ( ‘ 31 (t.! ! iii eizIcIItlLr oX the ha ii ).s I. st1pptn a A b 14 n’c orci and tI saint do not ciit br mterlt it-net 11 H ti’1 rgumcz t r both %‘de ‘try! p ‘- 1 U-’ appeal papcrs md thc recoil 13 1’ I orn t c ord th-it I-c ti’c, .tgrctmcnt il s’tk ‘us ‘ tire I tr at the it s a ur air d be r nd 1ii1 floor on tl-.. plaint sc’ritdulc propert I uztt ci t spctifk’d tha piur t ff c UUc.c ) eco’ 7 t[ t f C U mints i Jp t r he nrst 1.VM tinni Ui i ( ‘lie suzi t-emenl o ur lw r ,rut .,t * is n erment 1 iii .t - Ltrre.flt ? %, ‘It I’ ttIJhi S . t’e ttrl . i’ n• • iflt tat’. I ‘ci •‘ • — ‘acfl •T:tt •tc’ t•ii a “1312 1.t a —. • rI.—1. ‘lit t • —• . •• I .•. .1 I ;,i;. • ‘ ?.. ;.r’- • ‘:, •i._r: sI.,t,..’ •1_ •,•: t: •i • _If’ e• :•—. r.,.fl:..:ei: •‘: LI’I c •• •.. • —. ,. : — :. :‘ •‘, •• . ••— ‘ ‘•, — • — . ,• I . •. •. “I I. 11c It kndants ha a ir cd i sc the c ntsc p11W t sc PImfl( it iii icrceerien a tilt 1 )6 O) 0) . it : “ .r%r’ltt tt_. !a’ •i. p.n.tc’L I ‘ Cs ri-i:,? ‘r ‘ ‘ plaIn’ ‘I. fl1jt I?!atIbt t cp ‘ rej.,r:l. ‘.j I iuiscd 1 ) in Irom th Karnat Ia Statc I narn La’ C rpor i )n It s ‘h untenti r I tfg p1 mt If IF t s c ml °r t mciit f % 11 flcIS ne’ uterI to wabie tin defendants in claim ( ertain Ix rictus karn i’e,it ‘Ztit1 FLI1s_” ‘dl tflrpoflltI’iii cIt ft nd tnt% alsc ‘hc. hui r et en rd s ile wnsidc ration of 13 )O.Ouu at the I. mc f %tCO ia agree n tnt ‘ Fi ‘id c d ‘stun hs Vv (t il_i Fe sn •n’i drerrn n? ‘.1 salt d— i;l 2’’ 12 201) ‘ t us n’i n .ert sit d4flereni pm • ‘pet t’ lw-Ic,iitinw ‘. • thu deirnd.rnt C )j, t!w i,t her

1.41 511 + f T.i 1di ? flt4 i(ii, — d ‘ ‘_.. —t a I e - _• j_ I. r !, i, •,. ;: r r- -:zj! • • a-at ,.,- ‘1 • j r ‘t1.. [‘a a’’ I Cl’ 1’’ vi. , 1 s aireid po rtd U it on triand from tt s OUT )l iddtin is i rc.iitr°t i iti inc s Id 111 s pcrlorn k C nit h l bc F ps as an 1 tta vi U w S Cc 1’ perk in hc r part of obiwator Auain this Iindine f tF urtw,th r aims 11vLirgn S S t. r r with lavi. We find iio justifi ibic ground tc a tc rft it ith thc ‘arac 16 It is usc see frc xi thc iicncc F t t’ pia rtiff suit ot bOU,UUU ix ha bank acc ur rigit ton Jul3 200 I sn ildisf c F subsequ agretmuit o sale r quc.s n Fe par if als o c tS 00 i Vrriul Pire C )dC c r I a r i Li. team”1 eoUn4 fur rh deftnd ,,nttuu1k’1 that ‘ )ilTt 11:4” comm1tt(” ‘rn pflr no’ dl%CT’ gnk , tkfl” 2’.) £ ‘tic tptt1 Rc Lid Ct Wi ml” that tilt açretm of sale cfl”?d cjO2 as iaihidl and genulfl(” DtfCndTutS also jdttUt the firsl agrCtmtsuhI of bale nc1 cc’ dpi of gile :r,flstdtrau )11 vi 14 Mtt r dedUCtlOD o the pa’merit made by the plakM ° thC defendflt6 mci alsC o the arnatal’ Statt fjri’ tat coiporJ110X1 the ba1an’d salt cotlMdtfftiOht defetidtt1 b onl’ 1 .o2 000 It is tmltE to denY tlw dccc’?tt paVa’ o far spec div prdiflt’”’ to dic plaIntihl tils’ subStah1t %1.lm of halafl e saltC0IlMflB”’ pald a ruttht theft’ ‘b no pfradlfl no eviAefl tnt tin side of defet” dibi yettot1 unctfl qub :4ctlO 2 at Set üuO fl ot Spc flC Rclit! Mt In tPC Ciflt fltC’ 1t 15 ft t h t1t sC httt 0grt 1% y jq dr ft t’° re cit çC tts sp” tii( iX dO’t Wc fi d n ‘he’ ru rttttt 41 t jt” nOatt rt’r the ‘d% s Mt “i? “ ‘ £ S f )1LO’ , 4 I ‘1 c’1’•’ 4 13 (ii) The respondent/plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration amount within four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. (iii) Parties to bear their own costs. 3d!- JUDGE • Sd/ JUDGE Rms/