✦ Karnataka High Court

SHIVANANDA @ PEERAPPA SHARANAPPA KHEDAGI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP No. 100290 of 2025V SRISHANANDA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 11

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 100290 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHIVANANDA @ PEERAPPA SHARANAPPA KHEDAGI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O SHARANAPPA KHEDAGI WORKING AS RANGE FOREST OFFICER, BADAMI, TQ. BADAMI, BAGALKOTE -587201 R/AT 44, “BHAGYAVANTHI KRUPA”, HOUSE NO. C-28, GROUND FLOOR, SECTOR NO. 15, BAGALKOTE NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOTE 587101. …PETITIONER CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench (BY SRI. P. PRITHVI KIRAN SETTY ALONG WITH SRI. D.M. MALLI, ADVOCATES) AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY LOKAYUKTA (BEFORE ACB) BAGALKOTE R/BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001.

2.

POLICE INSPECTOR BY LOKAYUKTA (BEFORE ACB) BAGALKOTE 587101. (BY SRI. ANIL KALE, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:570 WP No. 100290 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., (528 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO, QUASH THE FIR DATED 15/03/2022 REGISTERED BY THE ACB POLICE, BAGALKOTE AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CR.NO.04/2022 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 13(1)(B) AND 13(2) OF THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988, ON THE FILE JUDGE, OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS BAGALKOTE AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments at length, Sri P.Prithvi Kiran Setty files a memo on behalf of petitioner.

2. A memo is filed signed by Sri D.M.Malli on behalf of Sri P.Prithvi Kiran Setty, who appeared through Video Conference and submitted that he has authorized Sri D.M.Malli to file a memo to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet.

3.

Memo reads as under:

The undersigned counsel the petitioner humbly prays to withdraw the present petition as not pressed. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:570 WP No. 100290 of 2025 HC-KAR withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition in the interest of justice.

4.

Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 11

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 100290 of 2025). ← Search more judgments