SRI HUSENSAB v. SHRI NAVEED AHAMMAD
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
contempt petition is disposed of for the present, with liberty to
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100037 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI HUSENSAB S/O PEERSAB NADAF AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN MUDAKAVI GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O MUDAKAVI, TQ. RAMADURG, DIST. BELAGAVI 591123. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. S.L. MATTI, ADVOCATE) AND:
SHRI NAVEED AHAMMAD S/O NAJEER AHAMMAD KAZI THE PRESIDENT GRAM PANCHAYAT MUDAKAVI TQ. RAMADURG, DIST. BELAGAVI 591123. ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
SHRI VIJAY KUMAR VANAKYAL PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER GRAM PANCHAYAT MUDAKAVI, TQ. RAMADURG, DIST. BELAGAVI 591123.
SHRI BASAVARAJ AINAPUR THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT TQ. RAMADURG, DIST. BELAGAVI 591123.
SHRI RAHUL SHINDHE THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT DIST. BELAGAVI 590001. …ACCUSED
THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEVELOPMENT (RDPR) - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6710-DB CCC No. 100037 of 2025 OF THE KARNATAKA STATE GOVERNMENT IS LOCATED AT ROOM NO.201/202, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR A1 TO A4; SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO, INITIATE THE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ALL THE ACCUSED AND TO PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW AS ALL THE ACCUSED HAVE DISOBEYED /DISRESPECTED AN ORDER PASSED BY THIS LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP NO.103169/2022 (S-PRO) DATED 13-06-2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) This contempt petition is filed complaining disobedience of order dated 13.06.2024 passed in WP No.103169/2022. Today, in WA No.100177/2025, impugned order dated
Operative part
13.06.2024 in WP No.103169/2022 is stayed. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of for the present, with liberty to - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6710-DB CCC No. 100037 of 2025 the complainant to revive the contempt petition depending on the outcome of writ appeal. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of as not surviving for consideration. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE JTR CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 32
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: contempt petition is disposed of for the present, with liberty to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12; Constitution of India — art. 215.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.