Judgment · High Court · 2011

IN FHE hIGH COT. RI OF KRNArAK CIRc’I. 11 BENC H. DII \RAWAD Dated th ‘ ‘Lu at 1)c cember loll BEFORL IION’131 E MR. J1SICE : ‘. JtNA1lI\N CRIh1?%AL APPEL No o2” - 200n BETWEEN. Rajashrkhiar.B Wali. ‘ge: Major Oc C: Propnetor of 13 V.\ au General Merchants & C ommission %gents B b. kPMC \ ard Amargol. Hubli 13 Sr Di1 esh l.KuIl’arr 1 Ahociie. ppellant Lrrnic hand .Jam ‘,P.” holder flt Deepesi ( ottnl; C’;xp’’! :TIL’Ia. Ni,. 3ii4. Ill linn: . Stn:t.rsi. kparillent I-’—s!i” ctfl.J1 4 ii. .5I 14c pc i ‘i’1 I. r f. 4 1 i-liLt Ii. ‘i 3 a. \ 4 Lir, b N N ( N N N N N ) a C N NN ( — N N NN N a a N ) N N N ± - N N N ) - )N N NN N ) 2 NN > N NNN NN ( ) N NNN CN E 0 0 C ) N 2 N ) ) N C N N N R N N 2 NN2 N N ) N N N N CN C N N C* N H N N N N — ) N N E N E H N N C N E N N N ) N N N C N N N ) N CN . C . . H N N N ) N r - t r N N N N )C N N ÷ - N . r N — N N C - N E NN N Nr NN - ( NN N N N N C N N l 2N2C NN ) N NN NN NN . N >N N N N ( C C C - N N — N N — ) N N a N H N ( N N N N N o - N N = N l N C N P ) N - N ) N N N - r N N N 2 N N t C H N N ) N N N N N ( N N ) C : N ) N - N N 2 2 l C “ - ) N N N N N — N N — N E N 2 — N ( N N E N E N ) 2 N - 2 N N N $ N N N ) N N c N ( N 2 N N N ( 2 N N N 1 ( N N > ) N N N N N N E N N ( 2 N N 2 N . t 2 C N N ) C r N ( N N N ) N N N N N 2 . ) N N N N ( N H N ( N N N N - ) a N N N 2 N • N 2 N C ) N • N N ) N E N N N r r N N ( N N N N NN N . ) N N E N N ) N N N N E N N ( C N N < N N ( N N N . ) ) N N N N N N N ( N . 2 N 1 ( . N N N H 9 N • 2 N H N - r N ( N N E . N ) N N ) N N N a C N N r 2 N 2 ) — N N N N ) N b . N N N N N N N . N C ( ( N ( N ) ) N N N ) Q • N N r : H ) — 2 N N — N N E • • ; c . . . 2 N E N N . . H i . N N E N S S said finding of tii court below is enoneous and ontran to the pT o isions cot ttaititd iii et tion i 38 of tilt N .1 \t I €nid IS tIs.’ tOIltt.II tO the 1.1 iIlLI (iflt) hi’ tilt. ‘ij)v ti’Liit hi th tat ‘iT C ‘ rn0. •‘ Cr’’ I — ‘1! •‘‘‘ I repurhi (I ifl lR lcj’’t’ Sc’

I Ia’ ing thus lit ant thc it arntd uilans( I k’t appellant and none appearing for the respondent and alter going through the judgment ot the t ourt beiow. the trial cowl scents to ha’e found fault with complainant for not mcntioning the amount n the mt icc issue ci I un nifos , 1 ‘k’ e r I ‘hr r at ‘ ‘.uit ‘ 1 j %iOs “5. liii. i ii . ft .1cC i I I ‘ii’ ‘a afl’, [ ‘1 C N ‘,C9ii ‘let I • 1 . ‘‘ I ‘‘‘ ‘I • 3 - i C C i C C C C C C ‘ — C C C H CC ‘ CC‘ CC — o CCC C C ) 2 2 C ‘ - C ‘ . C C C ‘ i2 C C ‘ C C C - C i C i C C i CC ‘ C C C C C C j C ‘ C . ‘ a C — C C C I I C . . C C C C — C C C ) 2 C C ( i o C C . C C a i C C ‘ ’ C — C - C H ) C C C C C C C . C C ‘ C C * ‘ C C C C C C C . - C “ C ) J . C C . C ‘ C I I ) — 2 - ’ C ( • > : — C — C — a - 9 C C C . 9 . 3 t i C C C C ( i C C C C C 2 C C C C - C - — r C C i C C C C i C C C 0 C C 1 ( C C 9 C C C ‘ i C C ) C C C ( C C C ( . ) 2 C i C C C ‘ C C C 9 C , — ‘ 1 C C ( C ‘ r C ‘ C C C C C . C C ‘ i C C C ( C C - C C 9 C C C C C C C ( C C C ( C C ‘ ) 2 C ‘ C C ’ 2 C C . ’ C ( C ) 2 C . i C C C C C C C r C ( 9 r 9 ‘ C C C C ( - C * t r — n C C C 2 C C C H C C C C C C C C ( C i - C C 0 i C ’ C * r C ’ r — ) C C C ( ) - C C 2 C C C ( C . ÷ i C C i ) C C C C i C C ( C C ‘ C ‘ D C C 2 ) ) 0 . - I 2 C ( C C C C _ . ) * 2 a C C C . C C C C C C C C C C C C ) 3 C C ‘ C C ‘ C C C C C C ) C 2 ÷ C — 9 i 2 C C ‘ C C I C ) C C C C — i C C 3 — H C ‘ ‘ C C — C ‘ ‘ — C C ’ r ‘ C . j C ( C C ‘ C ) — 2 C a C • o . c % C CC ( . ) C C C ( C C ‘ C ‘ C 2 H i C C • C C C C ‘ CC C C 2 C ‘ C 2 C C CH C C C C 1 ‘ C ’U C ‘ .a 2 ’ d C . ’ C C 2 i C C aç C C C •2 C $ C C 2o ) -D Co C i C c a . o 2 C i C C C C C C C C t r ) . . ) C ) C ) C ) C C ) ) ) C C C . - - ) ) ) C C C - ) C C ) ) C C . ) r C ) C ) C — ) C d ) ) C C C ) C ) C - — h T r ) r C ) C , ) - p — ) C ) C _ ) C _ ) C : ) C ) C ) C C j - - * ‘ — ) ) C - - ) C ) C C C - ) C ) ) C ) C _ ) C ) ) C C C ) ) C C ) C ) C r ) ) C C ) C ) C C ) - ) C — ) C o - . ) C t ) C 0 ) C ) C ) C C ) C ) C ) C ) ) ) C C C ) ) C C - ÷ - o ) C ) C * ) C C ) C l f . r C L 4 - ‘