High Court · 2011

fir” me iiieIcie’t has hi n I iWSt’4 IA hat’ lit iLhlfltii S. t1ifl C ontpIunai it :tiiti 111% mot’wr sei t ...bili. l I’ (,urii—dcutana L’ the (1 Unit itt l-lo%pft ii. Saratiur. ‘ nnipainant s 1irnil1ei ccrana ‘I. COiiflCt thin with tue diVision .f lift propt it Ii id ill il! agaiiist him m’d with an mtt nhlon to kill turn. pnurcc keroseiie on 111% bod. lit un aiu attcnipLd to kill and lhricbv lit ‘ustaint ci I,.irn lajurics. Since 1it %% unabic ti sign tl.e stnteincnt iccorckd In the Polic 2 ii a..fixcd Ins let. thumb impression I 1ils %tate,nt nt ‘uts ice’ irs r befon 1)r.1u...dish Ptil Oi the jasis ol L st12ft m’nt ‘it I. a%av) swn ir ik IC ha’ e rrsferc. a . rt’t iii ( Twit. Nc . ,/2( * trw ,h’ t,tfcnr( p in ci t1 it’ ii s t f fl flY I II :r 2C j3 2001 a 1 ‘. ‘ h hit’ -. ‘ t ‘r tt ‘ I Vu ‘ 1’’t ‘‘_P ‘ a •:‘ I Lg t ‘1 Lt.’1 LL • 1 ‘A • •• I .‘r i ‘I i— t j I(t; . ‘ •p, ,

3. AJwr inctIatioii PA. Si mm P.S.. laid chartc %I1crt :tLahIi’—T tli ac’ist ci ‘in iii’ .‘lfrnn i;uni.1iablt under H (‘lint ‘3u9 d TT-k f., ;‘1n.((I in flip ‘ intlilimni ih:,t .,i-t 26 03 200b at ilx it ck cca%cd a’ z’acIIng t i( nnvspapc r At i to his hou I e corn ii ‘1 1 r 1 icr of the cleeca.sc n 1 on tiM grc d on of 1 r t a p11w fi coniphunanit h %1J( nutibed t& thc 1 i 1 id then set ainc d sc ci c bun h k’t’lt 4111 W llfl!fle’ ‘1% ii’ 4 lid ( ‘ii’ ,inn;i c -n....’:;’n tht ft —.IIL .(‘c’ S.j’—t:il’j( 15 1,121., ttIb1’ dtil ‘1 dU.FI1( ti 1 f.l’l k.%I,ili1 t: ‘Ii’; ‘ia1IL tatkuie 1I( at T l,t I) i . ..1vhecl in I r,’.:,: ii I C I I 11 ) I S t 1’ C s d C 0 r C ‘ P.2. II. t bin her il’ ;1vi. i ‘a’an a clii ‘ tuc 1’’ ‘lip H’. mci P 1 u thi Se’ I i)411L’li$lIldfliJ in I esj)ei’t ‘‘1 deeea%ed Gatiganima. Both the—i itflc-t’ have ftnn’ il hio%!fl. in li” —.id “I j rosci tition 1 tI sed t er.in n sldlnt. w ‘act S fl. )Us’ . He niothet in ia” (iantfarnmn ua’ i esldin wil h ‘c era’ vu. Hi i elder son In ii ‘uij is iorknitt II’ Anm. The had 5 t its ci land ii 1lapur md 2 ierc s 24 L ic) o I ‘il’c hi 11 ‘In’ I) C” tli it ). 1 a 200€ .L ;‘ i. I v fl’ t £ • _‘ :‘ ta . nu T :a%a ; lb . .1! ‘1 • ‘I’ i .tr .rj 3%)t 1 •Ij .1,. :flt)).aJtC I:i’’ .-‘. lust I %i, ‘_t Ii c () 1 fe%t1a1 ‘Iiat. ‘?H 03 200.5 it aboit. / .30 d.rn.. ) i1’ it! Lii (‘1 ‘10th d(( 1% Il ‘i’ ‘o’i’ lirliut t P 1 Itt ‘ii ‘% ti S 1 uris dr’nandIn partiti’)Il ot the ur.mert . br that hubancI told hi n that. till ci k,ur days. I.e . after 1. gach %il e ii iii I -ott. 1 1 eenn ‘i was In his hc ust rh n’ her Vokba iy i er I to ‘.c’—ravva s hnhI%e and then fle returned to his dilLuat . ahoul ft00 am. ht. hushanc. as readin?, the neispaper. e a ‘it r t h- Inc t The ic cust d told him twit iii spite f’ ‘e ii Iemar dc lit inishutiri is .ini • o operating in div1ioii ‘Yt tilt prvpeit’ ie wa U ‘ad the hi ‘ii.c •n hi u-n ‘ ‘itt “ci tnn 4 r.’ to I I V’’1 tjjf_a i .i’i Hi is 1’’ 1 1 tht’ ‘ iii rk( ‘ J1. j ,15h;Ii;’I ai’d 1i1 nt. kn ‘a A% liol’,e i’ j. .. :rid 1 I ii •‘i a i PIT I ‘1 cit ‘‘ .s Mo ! I r — .1 tl vl ) . I I j. j. •! • ‘U ndIn( d burn injuries. ‘I c’r 1ei’crc- d ian son Gui i Lilkiavva also MIS 1 (3 bi sin inlurles !i..r mnsli.i in—Law .ti lii 11€ n ‘.. AlI%ci .tlso ustailIed injs1ne. Thncaftcr. %ht dtpned thai. her Ohi (;uInssj(icjana shifted lwr husband in ear to Government Ilosisjlal as Saanair At that time, tier husband Wa’ :ilth’ to talk. Pollee haiti also “ome to the I1o’p1ti anti ‘etnr(ied )i 4aterne-nt ol tI’c deceased. I)cea.ed has stated that. I s broi her poured lan oq iu and It f o him. The poth e I the same Into writ rn i isbanri wa’ 1 anent. uiiahh t injunt s 2006 0 tl(t )(‘th .. i I a”- boct

1. h’ a . ee Ii ,ic’ 1 law 1ed ‘I’ C ‘a ‘ill L ‘‘ ii • C 1 I .1 ji)

7.) •‘; ‘!., ;.•, I ,•i’;’• • . ‘ d S 4 4 . F 7 I ‘ V w a I L I: PW’ p b Asst Fxecu ‘e F 1w U I i%( I flV 1*1 iutililtecl (till iii’ P14 preilrr e. 1 PW Di K situ i. t i ash P KM H ii. 1% deposeti thai. he 1ui flr ee ii Basavvt Shivanidran a Ilo%inla i on 2t’ 03 20 6. lIt as ielc red b’ the It lit aI e .niHsr I t I I a bad %u%taifled 1i3111h Ida. bitt ns At 1 hr time 01 admisic.ui un rnqii’rv. BJa3ya disclosed that. lie ha% %1i%1-aliI.d burn Si 1 1 - •i B ifl I ci ad itti ii it Sitrex cnxtr. ncv “arci Utsa’ brtd ,ii’taiiir’ I • tp’l fj’ ia! t!t P bitt,. 1fl.!1i % tt hit : SO c 1 1 i>r I iUM. )-j.It ) . - (it’e, ?j tot till t ‘ muir ii’ 1% ..: ‘I itt tj1)% P ‘.2 I -i iti ‘ , .. —. E. 13 It is further deposed by this witness that, on 26-03-

2006. Smt. Gangamma was also referred to KIMs Hospital. Hubli the Medical Officer of Savanur Hospital. Gangamma was admitted in female Surgical A Ward with the history of homicidal burns. Gangaxnma, on enquiry told that he has sustained burn injuries as a result of throwing kerosene by her son. She was also treated by Dr. M. Desai. She has sustained superficial and deep bums to the extent of 35% to 4G,b. She expired on 30-03-2006. Accordingly. a certificate in this regard is issued as per Ex.P. 10. These certificates at Ex.P.9 and Ex.P. 10 were issued on the basis of the entries In original Medic Legal Case Register. During cross-examination, he states that, the person who suffers 60% to 70% burn injuries would be suffering severe pain. In such a situation, pain killers are injected by the Doctor. Sedatives are also given to such patients. After the sedatives are given, the patient will be in semi- 14 conscious or drowsy state for some time. Such a patient remains in drowsy state for 3 to 4 hours.

18. PW. 12 Is the Lecturer, at FSL KIMs at Hubli. He has deposed that, he conducted postmortem examination on the dead body of Basayya. Basayya had died due to burn InjurIes. The Injuries were ante-mortem in nature. Basayya had died due to toxemic shock consequent upon the burn injuries sustained by him. He Issued the Postmortem report accordingly. During cross-examInation, he stated that. the fingers of both the hands of Basayya were found burnt. He cannot state with reference to the nature of burn Injuries sustained by Gangamma as to whether she was doused with kerosene and then set fire. Basayya could not have given his finger print.

19. PW. 13 Dr.Santosh Gudageri has deposed that, 26- 03-2006. examined Irayva Shivantdrayya Hosamani at 5.30 p.m.. He found superficial burning of LI / PILL’IL”10I)19)L’’1‘Ii”q .13A()aijil“1i’IIljad%1!LU_Ill (4 fl.. i J)CT ITt CU 1 0 )IL%’.j )IP.M1•at11Il:)1nfl ILii (‘1U‘ l3d .I‘3 t1 -a.nuuu(If.-qdtuu.tic.’!atI(uT.41jj atppiaj’ )A t-tMd flP1tOUflMtUOtLc1p3ttfr.JcT ITWd ‘Cq u p a t inidsollpLIaT3aQ toor£09tnoirtis dUTA1O[flJaipunaUP‘LU1’OI6WIUPtLIV’(sHifcl-seq qjttjaij 4; I ‘t1fL4d lq’TJ.‘qt.ia.wqil_u!1”flsaqiif’ U)IUJJoi 111TTbII ‘ItJqIT1I’ .at’.pate r I PC) ( 4 4 1 ,n IL ))Ii’ jTj1LaIL .J.U’ Jill ‘tI .1 4Ij [.ieit.. I.up’jfl• — i—!‘H I ) 1 .‘:.;. ‘. ‘. —. :‘‘“‘ T S 0 SI 0 44 I I I I UI ‘C I I LI I— I r 1 ill) I ertifit .itL 1’. t ‘dtnt 1111% rciid .i per Ex.?. fli. Tin b’ni uhlLllk..% 11%t tined ‘n C tngirnm ‘ 10 t. ) ( ,. n€ i U. Ui was in i. p’isitlon to talk. Ii a -c mi di tat s t II 11cc 114(1 obtained i.ni (it the patients. He renieinbei the 10(1 Cit l’t Ia o L c , r i “ papers were ritten b the j.,olire. T-OJJ( e had ritten hit c )t ye i x 1 u n Ii a belo Ins ie1iiattirt He 1a— tltfl illtflth)flflI date belnw his s n F1 1 I 10 d t Ic Ii slgn-ittin . !-! Ins ist fl)efl.llbIiflI t’iflt ;n Ct?. i I-Ic Ii i” i a, I 9C U C) I i tbtt1 tl’L ‘‘itS b)tII)’% Of L’ I 1 C. 1 : .T’i’flirt;t ‘‘Iii’)t .‘ . .U ?‘.‘ L’ !;—. te;• ci, iIi 1 I I 3 •t p I p

1. PW 1 5. 1adeQoud’l s E.P.°O. the op ii Eirac i oi tin house ni Ha 22 flV 1 ( jijrusfrldtvv;j. ! ‘1’ ‘m ‘ Basana lie ha deposed ibm ‘we1I%rd wa havinQ propei’ of 5 ac’ics ii wiita ‘nc1 hi laihet ‘js having 2 arrs 28 aumas. Thc%e properties were divided accurdinii1 That. on 2(303 2006. .ir about 7.00 a Tn. ‘caxihasa.i i’wI eOiflt 10 his hou—.e A(’(’IISCLI nanding to clix ide the pi opt nv U Khata entr in I . r thai. his ta I ill cite (‘t th s fath 1 itt th din ti(’ 1i j ‘jkll( F ti: k’ ‘a ..qafl titci lJdagi ut 8 15 ingi r I IC F Ifl I Cd IL ci he s ,‘tl ii. 1r in I I :t ! i , i q . i.ilh. ‘ 1 t.’_it’ IC fla’ines ‘111(11 b ihui lull ‘ his iflJUkIIi’othc. r C.Uih m.i I C I I cli \ rg I ii U ( Ii C L’y ‘it iith II i u’ t \iIçIiltKf >I)tiL ‘ ii Ijic aiandrnoihcr Litd 1(1 c’cttu.,tiish lie Inc sh’ M Mdi It ii iiiJ iii 1CS. Accused attenipl cc to t-xI inguish I he ire of his .arandrnoihei An ust d thre i1w platic ntn and rc n iYw at th spot MO 1 and MO 2 were %e’zed He ilsc I u Si. a iur I slifted lb irJur i t lb r i Hopfta1 and rcm Sa anui Elk pU KMs I sp OIl 29 03 2006 aI :.oo p.m. his fatbei succ’.uinlxd t. mjurk On 30 03 2006. his randinothei sticc”tmbra to \Itc’ Ifla ‘iecuh c,I his 4he iiiiUr S at KIMs i’ospital Ilubli • I ‘i N “ tttur tacit cPt C )in. I s ‘ F T t r.inpe ft “siiC .. V 1’ .aIOtt( 1 t 1 iC ‘ii. ( ti lthtiJ) S at) fl ‘ JI ‘ t C ‘V tlLL cit ;1 V 20 I i ‘ia Li dais., Ba%ay a 1 Ic r eviilt-ncv jc on the %imilar Ihu’ with that of law. in UI c. S C stell filth lurid’ iii but ba c turned hostile In tile stilt of tim rosti ‘utmu. EW I)x I ).D. Ms 1

31. t at. ‘in 23-Oh 2006 at 12.10 p.m.. Basa3ya as admitted witit tht hl%ron nf hcmuc1daI but us %a4 wuied b him at S.CX) a n. re’ M’. In s deuic ii f VcIT S’.)1 He He na—. ‘u—’taiIs’ cj burn iIJJ’ nt . In dir t’Xtf’13t eI ,‘ H’ SO’. Iii’ se ituPinc d.Wfl lynn “.;Irk’ nn•1 upcrtii

1.1 It o i i\ I-’ 2 ia ‘t .J i ‘ 7’?: 1 UI. n ‘‘ ‘l.i• ii: t ‘ .! t” r’ ,rj .irii. 2i paticnt js niarki d at Lx P 23(li. IIisic’n d tilt iMIfli Injun I I •Icc: P t’ u(1 it is pci Lx P._. Ye) flu lh’imi ItI4Mt %jflfl ,t tlit pat:ent as takn bthnv ihi hi..ton as pc. Cx P.23(d) p 1 k j 1 } Ii r On 26—03 2006. 1);1ti.b1fl was ad ised not to bt given tonwhi inuctlon CM ) ias advis 1 to run’ c foi word q n I aRc admission. The ipiJal treatment tor bin ii inj’irle-s gtvej’ tu 13 ‘ I I ‘C 20’M3 ci 3.00 Hi. fiirri.tr dvpc-ed thai. %rnr. (.111u’v.” .iged 6.’ i, 12 15 .in.. ‘sh. — s. r.j 1 I rnt”Iien’ ‘ffl’ ‘r %I’e Ip.., its.. ‘: ) I

13.1’ id Ion 00’ 4, j 4%, It i1 .iiit (1T:9fl ,;‘ -,!.tt 1Si ilt_1’I ‘1: ti,.

1.—c it’i 1;’iIt cr’I:ic’— ‘ I .1 C ‘. C .. I t. , ..•L ‘4 ‘:‘ • . . . I I C M d a. t t I 1 I 1 I ) ) I 1 o t II ), 3 s c rs I S tl)1 3 ‘ Iii t 1 C) ICS r t 1 S r i r I 1 •1 1 7 r p prodi it ed hcfoi c I he Cot u-i or not Today lit %clzecl i lit b i I I i Lx P. 17(c). Esciore ierorrhnt the’ 1aI’ rut itt ni Ba%avva. hit’ I ‘U I r it’ re i in lC hUll WtLS ii’ il pi)%itli)lI It’ speak. c q Ut v a C ha. recordea tlw dyini tiechiratlon as per là P.17 Exi-’. 16 ion c iid E P 7 is npl ‘in hut was treated as d3 im! Ic cla.ration i.e. her hr d ath f Inj red Bacuyya Tie has a1’o reeordtd i-jr swreme’it of ne Cs 1/ Ia oct i. Shivanand. 13aa ani anpu. hannaRot ida Siilramurteyva C i It tutu’ ifti (stocI’ . 11€ rnpwstt a Ui’ 4Vb depattitit-ni / j) (b ‘ t t I-i I t’r’,: F.: tiTtflh1-l: F””’ ,• ‘ p,,j C -:a.td_ 1 ) iLls I its.’ lSdt JU - Let b lilt •‘, ( 1 1 Di iring hi’. COS% narnination. tatc s iliat. (lflfl l(fltt t ‘.t( lit olix ia axe 1i1 1 1t t’V ii ii 1 1 vIIlae.

32. P\V.97 J’tvar.a’ C “C 1002 stilt’ handing over of the dead body of deceased Gangainnia to it qal h air f dec si cc! a ter pos mortem a I 1 i 2 B,ij C rppaeli nded cc is d nd n’ di tdtx ii II DL H d 1 t I - C 1 4 a ci Cr P C 3% fl( (.—cIei b’ dir ii Wi t’Gt’fl \. ( used Ir — denied zht inn nnnii Ina4 ‘ n airnst-ln: cc appa_irine €‘uaiflst n ht a n I qes ) 1 I I — ‘ I ).. I I t ‘ .1 :j’ ..s( inc I 4J 1 . ‘J )11),J;’ I lj,j :ii.. I1.C1c and iiic’ii lie Went in exiiIlwLi%la lilt- tue. 1w has 1it.unt-d :ljunt s 1 h 3 IS 1 inlinnit 1 \. I 1 i - cioi e i a formed an opinion thai 11 is unsaft to pidte I t-liani-t on ch iiu declaration (if Basavva. 36 1 ‘1’rIal iterely 011 1 net o ) a a ant in ouse c says a a he alIt icldeni took plane. 1 heir pre..ew-e at tb” cnme scene is found to bt natur.tl Thc have described itt’ hui’lclent ‘-lairh. - No inatetial ye b en c cited Irom he t ross c nination i .i c. t inc i 011 La’ ija-1 - -“ tt1e ---,‘i a tin aft-il’ I L_ ‘ nn’ i— I liii x;1iit %( :m Vflfl obor-uc- by I’ C U I ‘ iclri.’ ‘111e hi1’ n j-iI e- it b_ ‘ L 11% i.. ; i ‘h’ ‘-1 r.-e-t -mi” I I) I -h (I t ‘. ft’ K I, ). SeC tion 30’2 of 11-’U 7 Ftc { a inc in t tied k )(fl :;8 - ‘iau catel iI p rused the Trial (01111 ds. 3$.) ‘1 t It is the vntenuon of the learnec’ r.ttt,r%t_1 lot F r ‘cc Ic II Register Extract Ex.f’. 11 and liFton gi en In the MIt R S ma. she E I I (c iid %tor h h eca I ( gain ‘t of Vs. P i6 ai.I flV )? art’ the rtiatnes nf ch-ee€t%ed 1Wrcrn% lilt1 r 1 :at ‘rp—n- Wit :t’ I’W .2• 1 Li :‘- ill r •4 i9W I tCll’ (I” IILIH1”d). ‘11(11 t 9 Mi 1 i It ) .1 1(11 •nf ;. It -Fl II. •‘i •: r •ih( (I .n1 l ‘‘ il.t j(ji’ iiIe,ed hs l’ie pi oseciitiini I also Itict Thc. gritni’ of thc 40 .5 W 1 7 Is choiated the mec al evidente ft.’ evIdence 01 PW.5 is tiEd) corroborated with 11w evldente ol TO M jçe tal 4lshed Ire wn rite n Idente of PWd and ) elders 1 ill2g o cond’ I Cl) jWC ) OX C oma I arratea Iston before 11w Doctor 311(1 tin saint was reduct d li-il o wnnn b• the Doeloi. Fhe d inn aec’larat Inn i’ i imi by flV 25. EJ’.23 aii’l P.23(d) ar’ ‘n tlw handwritIng n’ j P Ct (tnt 41 j siu r let enn In .— •trp’ fl I V he—tue the 1L(kiI!I fit ( (,I’VWIi( ii —: i’ . .‘ tq ii ‘•Ii jOt I ie’i “9

12. Ansur P the aN ‘..t point s as aid i tn the k.llrmia4 r(asfl Ih 1 Ci It I c% 1) flL ‘1 .111 opinion that . 1 .17 s if , I ) r tfc t. s intl ‘nuties as d theicfcnr . I. pint rn that. it k unsafe to it’. on Lxi. Ii nit d i also the mitt nnoii ot 1 i’ learnt d ‘o tn’cl I i liii app 1lan I. Ti i’ strdeiir who icc o dc d tlu F Is ‘n a1 Ic the P (.1 p’ttlent was not examined by the prosc u I n there is Insulxic’Ienl n idence tc i e1 on tlt •pj r’k r’ 1 1st on ri .trrated 1w thc patient as to how the sustaincd njuries. Though t’ic t ontennon ol the it ‘inied councl tm the tppcll’nt the Indian appears to be sound b’at Se ion 32(2) E’ idcni c An rcads as under. Sec 32 of Indian Evidence Act Cases In which statement of relevant he by person who is dead or cannot be found. etc., is elevant. 1) • c1c nt Iats • “ic 1 ) air t c..d st C LI 1 ât.i iii Ii i Statt rnent. ‘wnhlen 0’ ‘bCF.) is 3 1’,(ni st’) I’. 4e’d i . 1 )ii haapable of anina 111101 I” ‘‘c,’ 1’i(J ‘ithotit C ib. t enc ‘•h’ch. 01111 IT)1)’lfS 1) Ccln t Iuiat ‘rtlettiI 3cI. iitIq 1 r C 11’ th. r 1 t,t Ii n I i s i 0 1, When it relates to cause of death. When the I Alic is a tde by a r erson as t statement &ius of hi deth, or s t n’ m tat sileimli u e of th t ath. rson’s I o any s s it tI C qi stion, Such statements are relevant whether the person who made them was or was not, at time when they were made. under expectation of death. and whatever may be the nature of the proceeding in which the eat se of his death comes into qnest ion ‘ c X titemint 2 or is made In cause of business p€ ta m dc b su I tusiness, a d it consisb f any entr h crlinry cot r’c part cnlar whe i memorandum made by him in books kept in the ordinary course of business, or in the discharge of professional duty: or of an acknowledgment written or signed by him of the receipt of money. goods. securities or pi pcrty of at md; or of d a or locumcnt y hi ntercc e r I 1 ‘ I In t1 asc, no d it is the st gradna student who has recorded the histon, But usually, the P/i studcnis asist in discharging the prctessionai duty oi iheir 1k ads of I itun nt )rimafl’ will hc by tile Ix It a Ut Ic vob t trainin ‘ in i similar v-n. ‘lu P 6. %tudent reeordt—d t lie hktncv ii order te the Pi (‘Ie%snr I n )t 1 v 1. 11 s q C X I U’ PG ud ‘iii wk lie Its ha an’ their pr ;Ies siona.1 iutv. Since both the mjured %uccurnbed to thy but n Inlurv and tlir ta mit iaebfr c’ (i ied’t stdcit b re ‘ci at I t rc is io lh’ o lit- c inc itt n raised 1w the 1earii ‘d n ,unccI tar t lie a pellani Is that PW.3.PV lbarlflV. 1 re hcm reted nesc a I tiirv Sr% aiotbebeed. Ti- (.ti Las obserreci that PW 5 PW 16 aid flV. 17 art blood ri’lati es. 1i.e presencc rf t ies. witncs%f s I 1e sjx i u i d tx rc en t dibd ol ii a itrrrc’ted vi1irs%e. I t4 11.1’ I jfll !t’e14p1) its ittipiic.iit iii. if tt’n’tI .i1’&! ot1IinL in’ b’ n 1,r’ tci t •..l a . fl_( C I i t. I 1r jjri. tI —:u’ah Jtitt ‘i’r •5t d Ig •‘ L ‘ i. •;q,e ii.ta:’ l.cbI iLlt t 4 I 1 13 In thic. e’ist iher i i iuic endenee In, the efftct that. th .ieeu%ed came:. with an iron piix hilt d with ktu se it md ik pIi%fe •ti md %prnkkd ketosene- on th hotly of Bac..i vu arid c..4 1dm on lire isas In fimmec.. At that tlrnt. hi’ mother (xangami i and attemptt d to extinguish thc fire md n that process she io qustainc d ourn injuries. botiL injured 13asa a and 0 ing imma sue timb ..d to the Injm It s. 1’Imt se things have been e,iabhslwd by the evidence of eye mntnesses and flc,c fr,, tjx ontents of the Cafl de Lu atlon and is’ (‘onsequentlv. he c a fl c n borait d by the: medkal ewden e . throutJi ecu tt n s of PostrnnPc.n, exami.ntion L-rporL. l’inugh Oft cf the contertic n r ii tci Is h it f c inn tI,.zaUrt3 t’t It ci ii1 rc”jr1c ci iii’ .iyzn •it ri.iiat.oi I ‘-‘a%a%va is the i 4mm h flf I h -Ic c—is’d . t ih e a’r •.tift U no taun.. hit t’iI the: ,)j(fl(j 7 %IIfl% aj•• • C - r ikkrl k 1,cnt Fl dt n’eas d — “l%I’I )j 7; 11i I qe ‘pod “ ‘ci ib on’ t_ 1 1 dp iP ( Vh ili’p t - TI a IS ‘i’ t ‘h’ ‘ I) ‘ j .1 t 1 ) 1’ 1% 1( 5) U.. P’h1Y11t. Gan,jainma. heintt the mcdlii i cit the (Iecra%i ci Has yva eI1 9% hc. miuln. met ha’.’ I ilseh ml) Ti t Ii IL fljVP wlu Is tli’ will of tin deceased vas Prec1it at the n1 e ilk U. Nail I elicited in the cross earnimiation ol PW., o di wllei her testimony. The evidence of PW. 16 i’ cogent t t i ‘ircr I’i ro ) r ovem all cli cunistamiets €ind also the endenc’c placed on re( d ts I di view hat s m gxou d to 1C tI 01 510 1 1 Therefore. wi confirm the pidgriient of ec.iwu tion rebo’ dccl Ir 11 Iii it%s I ‘t’i cib’nr (‘lt ‘—Si’’l ‘ iV” ‘c tl )