✦ Karnataka High Court

DODDABALLAPUR – 561 203 v. (BY SRI MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)

CRL.A No. 100003 of 2022SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Today, despite passing over the matter, learned counsel for the appellant is not present. There is no - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4333 CRL.A No. 100003 of 2022 representation on appellant’s side. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence…

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100003 OF 2022 BETWEEN: IRAYYA S/O. MADIWALAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: BANASHREE NAGAR, NEAR RADHA KRISHNA SCHOOL, 580004, BEHIND SDM COLLEGE, DHARWAD. (BY SRI S. S. BETURMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: SHIDDALINGAYYASWAMY B. HIREMATH, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: C/O: ABHJIYA ENTERPRISES, BEHIND RAJARAJESHWARI HP PETROL PUMP STATION MALLATAHALLI, DODDABALLAPUR – 561 203. …PETITIONER ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad (BY SRI MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND TO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL DATED 06.12.2021 PASSED BY THE 3RD ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DHARWAD IN C.C. NO.1677/2019 WHICH IS REGISTERED FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT, AND CONSEQUENTLY CONVICT THE RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT AND IMPOSE ADEQUATE SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4333 CRL.A No. 100003 of 2022 AND FINE ON THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent present. Learned counsel for the appellant absent. Learned counsel for the appellant was absent on 11.03.2024 and also on

31.07.2024. On 31.07.2024, this Court passed the following order:

No representation for the appellant, even in the afternoon session. As a last chance, list this matter next week. If the learned counsel for the appellant fails to address his arguments on the next date of hearing, necessary orders would be passed.

Operative part

2.

Today, despite passing over the matter, learned counsel for the appellant is not present. There is no - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4333 CRL.A No. 100003 of 2022 representation on appellant’s side. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE CT-ASC

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 378(4); Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.A No. 100003 of 2022). ← Search more judgments