GANDHI RAO P.R v. PADMAJA P.R
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 36281 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. GANDHI RAO P.R., S/O. LATE RAMAIAH. P. E., AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMEESHWARA ESTATE, ARUVATHOKLU VILLAGE AND POST, GONIKOPPAL, SOUTH COORG - 571 213.
2. SUBHASH RAO. P. R., S/O. LATE RAMAIAH. P. E., AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMEESHWARA ESTATE, ARUVATHOKLU VILLAGE AND POST, GONIKOPPAL, SOUTH COORG - 571 213.
3. RATHNAKUMARI. P. R., W/O. DINESH P.S., AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT KAMARA TEMPLE, MAYAMUDI VILLAGE AND POST, GONIKOPPAL, SOUTH COORG - 571 213. DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. RAMA RAMACHANDRA IYER., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:22965 WP No. 36281 of 2025 HC-KAR AND:
PADMAJA P.R., W/O. MR. RAVINDRA. P. P., AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.1896, 5TH MAIN, HEBBAL II STAGE, MYSORE - 570 017.
MRS. SHANTHA KUMARI, W/O. SADANANDA P. V., AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NEAR RAJESHWARI TEMPLE, POLALI, KARIYANGALA VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK, POLALI POAR KARNATAKA - 574 219. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.JNANESH KUMAR K., ADVOCATE FOR C/R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2025, PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VIRAJPET IN FDP 5/2023 ON I.A. NO. III PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:22965 WP No. 36281 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo dated 24.04.2026 is taken on record.
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.