SRI M K ANANDA v. SMT MANONMANI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Appeal stands dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 96; O. XIII r. 12
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. It is made clear that the matter may be finally heard on the next date, with the consent of the parties. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.30.06.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1991 OF 2011 (PAR) BETWEEN:
#1. SRI M K ANANDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O.LATE M K JAYA
#2. SRI M K NANDA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O.LATE M K JAYA
#3. SRI DEEPAK AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS S/O.M K ANANDA
#4. SRI DHEERESH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS S/O.M K ANANDA
#5. SRI ANISH KUMAR MAMATHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS REP BY ITS FATHER SRI M K NANDA APPELLANT NO.2 ALL ARE R/AT. M K JAYA COMPOUND NES COLONY, HUNSUR MYSORE DISTRICT. (BY SRI. B S NAGARAJ., ADVOCATE) …APPELLANTS HC-KAR - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:39958-DB RFA No. 1991 of 2011 CNR: KAHC010769732011 AND:
#1. SMT MANONMANI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS W/O.JEEVAN R/AT.NO.79/11, M K JAYA COMPOUND N E S COLONY, HUNSUR MYSORE DISTRICT
#2. SMT USHA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O.LATE PURUSHOTHAMA R/AT. C/O.PUTTASWAMY NO.424 GROUND FLOOR, 17TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, K H B COLONY, 5TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE
#3. SMT ASHA W/O.ASHOK AMIN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT.DURGA NIVAS, ROOM NO.5, BLOCK “G” NEAR ITI POWAL MUMBAI
#4. SRI BASAVARAJU S/O.DEVAIAH AGRICULTURIST, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT. BILIKERE VILLAGE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK
#5. SRI NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O.DODDAIAH R/AT. BANNI STREET, HC-KAR - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:39958-DB RFA No. 1991 of 2011 CNR: KAHC010769732011 HUNSUR TOWN MYSORE DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUNIL S NARAYANA., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 & R3) This Regular First Appeal filed Under Section 96 OF CPC, against the Judgment and Decree dated:15.07.2011 passed in O.S.No.158/2005 on the file of the SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNSUR, partly decreeing the suit for partition and separate possession. This Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER
#1. On the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, the case is adjourned to enable him to file translations of the documents/depositions on record, duly attested by an affidavit as required under Order XIII Rule 12 CPC (Karnataka Amendment), within 3 weeks, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
#2. If the translations are duly filed, list the matter on
28.07.2026. HC-KAR - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:39958-DB RFA No. 1991 of 2011 CNR: KAHC010769732011
#3. It is made clear that the matter may be finally heard on the next date, with the consent of the parties. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.30.06.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 96; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XIII r. 12.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.