✦ Karnataka High Court · 12 Jun 2012

P. K.Narayanamurthy v. Union of India

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Placing the statements made in the memo on record, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at the risk of learned counsel for petitioners. Ordered accordingly. tsn* Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA REVIEW PETITION No.593 OF 2011 Between: P. K.Narayanamurthy, S/o. Late P.S.Krishnamurthy, Aged about 67 years, (Ex-Sepoy), R/at. No.460, 3rd Main Road, Nagendra Block, Srinagar, Bangalore-50. (By Sri. Vijaykumar.S.Jatla, Advocate) …..Petitioner And:

#1. Union of India, Represented by Secretary, Ministry of Defence, South Block, DHQ P.O, New Delhi.

#2. The Chief of Army Staff, Integrated Headquarter, Ministry of Defence(Army), COAS Secretariat, South Block, DHQ PO, New Delhi-110 011.

#3. Commandant & O-I/c (Records) The Records Signal, Pin-908770, C/o. 56 APO. 2 ……Respondents This Review Petition is filed under Section 144 R/w. Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for review the Order dated 14/07/2011 passed in W.A.No.375/2010(S-PEN), on the file of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore. This Review Petition coming on for orders this day, N.K. PATIL J., made the following: O R D E R The petitioner herein have sought for review of the Order dated 14/07/2011 passed in W.A.No.375/2010(S-PEN), in the interest of justice and equity.

#2. Learned counsel Sri. Rajesh, appearing on behalf of Sri. Harikrishna S. Holla, for petitioners, on an instruction from his Senior has filed a Memo dated 12th June 2012 seeking permission to withdraw the above petition as not pressed.

#3. Placing the statements made in the memo on record, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at the risk of learned counsel for petitioners. Ordered accordingly. tsn* Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Karnataka High Court, on 12 Jun 2012. The bench was N K PATIL, S N SATYANARAYANA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Review Petition No. 593 of 2011). ← Search more judgments