SRI. THIPPESHI v. SRI. Y.M. CHANNABASAPPA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- LALITHA KANNEGANTI
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:10563
Outcome
Disposed of
Hence, the petition is disposed of and all IAs
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Hence, the petition is disposed of and all IAs., in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23 CT: BHK
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO. 16 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. THIPPESHI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D NO. 1725, 18TH CROSS, KTJ NAGARA, OPP STADIUM, DAVANAGERE - 577 001. (BY SRI. MARUTHI G.B, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. Y.M. CHANNABASAPPA, S/O YAJAMAN MOTHI DODDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS, R/O D NO. 283/3, P.J. EXTENSION, 4TH MAIN, NEAR VISHWESHARIAH PARK, DAVANAGERE - 577 001. (BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA N, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23.10.2024 PASSED IN HRC NO. 03/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DAVANAGERE, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.31 AND 27 OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT 1999. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10563 HRRP No. 16 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that as per Section 46 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, when an order is passed by Court of II additional Civil Judge and J.M.F.C. at Davanagere, the revision lies to the District Court, but the same is filed before this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the District Court. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Court.
Operative part
Hence, the petition is disposed of and all IAs., in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23 CT: BHK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petition is disposed of and all IAs
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115; Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 — s. 46.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.