Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAM MOHAN REDDY
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No. 2240 OF 2011 (PAR) APPELLANT BEIWEEN: SRI LAKSHMIPATHAIAH S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/A ROJIPURA, 4TH WARD, DODDABALLAPUR TOWN, BANGLORE RURAL DISTRICT (BY SRI. S A KHADRI, ADV.) ABSENT AND
SRI THIMMAIAH Sb LAT GOVINDAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR (A) SMT SAKAMMA W/O LATE THIMMAJAFI, AGED 58 YERS, (B) SMT PADMA D/O LATE THIMMAIAH, W/O MAHESHA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. R/A NO.129, BYRESHWARA NAGAR, 9TH CROSS, LAGGERE. YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI, BANGLORE NORTH TALUK (C) SMT SHARADAMMA AGE: 35 YEARS W/O UMESHA,D/O LATE ThIMMAIAH. R/A BANDAYANAPALYA VILLAGE, MADHURE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK SMT PU1TAMMA W/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/A LAGGERE, YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK SMT KAMALAMMA W/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/A BANDAYANAPALYA VILLAGE, MADHURE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK SMT JAYAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A KAMALAPURA VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NALAMANGALA TALUK SMT. PU’ITALAKSHMAMMA W/ 0. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A. KAMALAPURA VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK SMT SAVITHRAMMA W/O LAKKANNA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRs.
(A) RAN GANATHA S/O LATE SAVITHRAMMA AND LAKKANNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS (B) SMT. RATHNAMMA D/O LATE SAVTTHRAMMA & LAKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, (C> SMT NANJAMMA D/O LATE SAVITHRAMMA & LAKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/A HULUVANGALA VILLAGE, KOLALA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT
LATE GANGAMMA W/O LATE GOVINDAPPA, SINCE DEAD, HER LRs, ARE ALREADY ON RECORD RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DT. 9/4/2002 PASSED IN RA.22/97 ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AT BANGALORE, AND UPHELD ThE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT. 9/9/1996 PASSED IN O.S.174/92 ON THE FILE OF PRL. MUNSIFF & JMFC, AT DODDABALLAPUR. THIS RSA IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ThE COURT MADE ThE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Case called twice, once in the morning and once in the afternoon. There is no representation. Appeal dismissed. Rd/ Sd! JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.