TN THE HTflH HuOPT QF KARNATAKA AT BANGAF ORE v. STATE

trial court s pted a ver tI’e to spe c.t as t. ‘ entitle :i’ ?i’ii • r .1’ ct .a. din ( )aid c’oiro ;rni-J ;uor -.‘s virr.irly tcv’.,t:a i’ito tIn ‘h1es .1 L 42 4SflilM iin’ci’r’c’ t e “tfire to a’wl. tr tnt amourt I. JL:4 irrJ., • r e aria..; Iiai” L rhch r rads ins. Cftke MPflr 9 0 9910 1 C, 1 / ( 15 Lure-I trur. 54.1I. year- 15 (3: Co u: 2 bL* 2:1 - -. / S -F •a N I v datnn as per Qoprt r(jer 1 19°8 Rs 0 c ID2. rrom 24 1143 52 C°200° re.. br IC *r- 411 5 dae-, or Is C 4*5 42 -Co Dr as No it due by Cc Rs 5 0 — 5 Irr’ nreira 11 12.75 4 1 195.1 a ‘duLl’! 4 *,rE D-t P’’15 ‘0 3 c. ‘ ,— 4 c ) - Tot 0 ba’ 09 ice m,t. t au by Cz t e )r i on e .3 Sa,an’e a”. tint due sn :eb,)ect of :cst f 4enre ‘ L1oo 00 1 Co. 0’ 5-;- ro 4he ate e 13 1 or’ R’-.l.OOO-QO ror one vedr yN ‘Pc 3’ 15 interest on Rs.1.000 - fron 4 12.70 2009, e.. for 38 year’ 9 months to 3’ r 6 6 60 1 40 Pc. 90 ($ P.5.823-CO 4) Total balance amount due y J.Dr ac on 30.09 09 n recpect of inst of fence 6,913-30 / sb JD as ertesd°4 ed_ 0° 00 I. Balance amount due by J Dr. as per the on 30.9 09 air I ‘r “F) 191R 83 Rs.5.23-0u i Sal nou tdue ‘v)Lfl asni 30&9.00 m ‘espect ‘f )acrnine olant. :sor’h Rs 750’ 0 • V0 bAt no c bvLn 0 fl9.3” :1) ‘eSPc’ jr;e Trees “ ‘Do fl.S 110 3 ajir.Ø nd I t.’I “r ‘, 0 —‘ .b5 09 3 0 r . 3 F 13’’ T ‘-S k ) C $ 0 )y r K -, 3C .iF : .: ( L r j e eIAC U. mentio’ec1 i , .rr;:n as flaying beet’ pail t•’ etitiuner tttt.., h—s •m r nt There is no statment . i d t of e er. at iIi p • t, petitio en L arned JL dqe n s based hic nr.i’rk. !fle basis of the office note and ha’ fl. b,n o ar nt v S

It must its •,‘ in this proceeding, to avoid ‘vir t ‘ •d to A •t nas ben •-r’;. :-• i reply ‘he 1 AO tiled a staterner.t ?dmfttipfl ‘Ii i .1 t’’ pet; tirler tht he is o.tItieO ( e S cr&,j f. - ‘ic, ge:v t? flt%r. •1. t’rnoe • .‘1r... ‘ h’ V j.. •i . r i.IbbI •• • t’t. •tte:i’e t fA. ;,i Ii’ ., st. r il-i ‘ t LI.. nm) •v I’ ue( • • • t; ti’ •;C •:flt (•.id’’ • I •t .11.’ J’iC S i’is the executing cow c. I the claim of the petitioner. It has not nly f e o comply with the ‘jarectior: ‘if this cnirt jn C.!’ :‘i:c8 by which ft was d.rectetl to ô1 ulate rpa amounr paab’e n1’ the ttial court nas decided the issue. In the circumstances, order impugned is set asid Ti ‘trial rourt is directed to respondent-LAO to furnish material partirulars rngardinq entitlement £ S the petitioner as also ,aynient ot amot. it to the “etit orer decree holder arid pass apjru[øridte r,,der; r tr tI)dfl indulging iii owl calculati ..rl as has bc i the result d782 t tI. d to arter a’ r.’c tV a. cwed. .[e 19c4, -Co ttor; ni.& rt tip -hal n’,ii i .1 .ia parti t.la far n’. ‘. . J ‘ I r . ‘ — . ,, ,l. t r ) [ ( c c c 6 £ 6 a a a i c 5 — a O t i c a , i L 3 3 i c a a a i c a ) I L a 1 1 ( t r r v L a 3 : T C i c a . 6 — Q C ‘ p a 3 : t r i c 0 ( H - U L a o C - t r — n i 2 ‘ i c ‘ - - a t a i c a t r . a — D 3 ‘ - a t r a < I L ( 2 a r r 0 r r i c a L C a i c o — a — - t , C ‘ l f C n r ‘ ‘ - 3 t r a a - i c a > Q 0 ( . i c a ) 0 n i 3 : -a t — r n i 3 o < a < - 2 2 a n i - ‘ - — o i c c c- c n i a 3 0 i c a o o t r n r4p 4 — ‘ * i c H