✦ Karnataka High Court

Writ Petition No. 29185 of 2023 · Karnataka High Court

Writ Petition No. 29185 of 2023

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.29185 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI RENI JHON @ JOSEPH S/O P J JHON AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, DOOR NO.15/456 PATTASERIYIL HOUSE MARTHOMA NAGAR, GUDALUR THE NILGIRIS TAMIL NADU-643212 (BY SRI ANISH JOSE ANTONY, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER SMT SHILPA ALIAS SHILPA MARIA W/O RENI JHON, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.22, KNO 3RD STREET MARKHAM ROAD ASHOKNAGAR BENGALURU-560025 PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 18/12/2023 PASSED BY THE III ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE IN MC 5059/2019, TO THE EXTENT OF DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO PAY ENTIRE MAINTENANCE AND TO REPORT COMPLIANCE. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:1067 WP No. 29185 of 2023 ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to subsequent Order passed by the concerned Court, the present petition has rendered infructuous. The submission is placed on record. Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous leaving all other contentions open. Sd/- JUDGE List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 29185 of 2023). ← Search more judgments