MR. PRASOOSH S RAO v. STATE BY KAMAKSHIPALYA POLICE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The revision petition is dismissed as not pressed with
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1580 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR. PRASOOSH S RAO @ PRADOOSH S/O SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O HOUSE NO.56 J.P. ROAD, GIRINAGAR BANGALORE -560 085. (BY SRI K. DIWAKAR, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI ADITYA D, ADV.) AND:
STATE BY KAMAKSHIPALYA POLICE REP. BY STATE PUBLIC ROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. KEVAL RAM DORJI S/O JAYABAHADDUR DORJI AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT NO. SATVA ANUGRAHA APARTMENT, SUMMANHALLI NEAR INDIAN PETRO BUNK ULLAL, BANGALORE. Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRASANNA KUMAR P, SPL.P.P.) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401(FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.09.2025 PASSED AGAINST THE APPLICATION FILED U/S.227 OF CRPC AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 302 AND 34 OF IPC. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:7992 CRL.RP No. 1580 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER
Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, submits that at this stage, the revision petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file necessary application under Section 216 of Cr.P.C. before the Trial Court at appropriate stage.
Operative part
2. The submission of learned Senior counsel is placed on record. The revision petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
All contentions urged are left open. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The revision petition is dismissed as not pressed with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 442; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 216, 227; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.