Kantharaju @ Kariya v. State of Karnataka
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Munirathnamma W/o Late Narayanaswamy, Aged about 45 Years, Lakkasandra Village, Lakkuru Hobli, Malur Taluk, Kolar District-563137. Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (By Smt. R.Sowmya, HCGP; R-2 - served) …Respondents - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:22744 CRL.P No. 116 of 2024…
Judgment
(By Sri Maruthi G.B., Advocate) AND:
State of Karnataka By Malur Police, Malur, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Court Complex, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru-560 001.
Munirathnamma W/o Late Narayanaswamy, Aged about 45 Years, Lakkasandra Village, Lakkuru Hobli, Malur Taluk, Kolar District-563137. Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (By Smt. R.Sowmya, HCGP; R-2 - served) …Respondents - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:22744 CRL.P No. 116 of 2024 This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to grant the anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.243/2017 Malur Police Station (S.C.No.151/2017) pending the file of Hon’ble in the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-1 (POCSO) at Kolar for the offences punishable under Section 366(A) of IPC and under Section 376 of IPC and Section 4 of POSCO Act, 2012, in the interest of justice and equity. This Criminal Petition, coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. Memo is placed on record. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 366(A), 376; POSCO Act, 2012 — s. 4.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.