✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI T G NAGARAJU v. SMT. S R GEETHA

WP No. 31438 of 2025PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

Case at a glance

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 31438 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI T G NAGARAJU S/O LATE GURUSIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O MIG-II, HOUSE NO. 18, ARALIMARADAPALYA AREA, KHB HOUSING COLONY, SIRA GATE, TUMAKURU 572 106. REPRESENTED BY SPA HOLDER, SMT RAJESHWARI W/O T G NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O MIG-II, HOUSE NO. 18, ARALIMARADAPALYA AREA, KHB HOUSING COLONY, SIRA GATE, TUMAKURU 572 106. (BY SRI. RAMESH K R., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. S R GEETHA W/O S G MALLIKARJUNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NEAR THAMMAIAH HOSPITAL, SHIRADI SAI BABA NAGAR, TUMAKURU 572 103. GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONER THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED …RESPONDENT - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:45383 WP No. 31438 of 2025 HC-KAR ORDER DATED 04.09.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED V. ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND VI. JMFC, TUMAKURU ON I.A. FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 10(A) R/W. SECTION 73 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, IN O.S.NO.483/2008 AT ANNEXURE-A AND THEREBY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 10(A) R/W. SECTION 73 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, IN O.S.NO.483/2008 AS PRAYED FOR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to urge all grounds that are taken in this petition before the appropriate forum in other matters that are filed against the respondent including the very same case before the trial Court. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 31438 of 2025). ← Search more judgments