(BY SRI. JAGADEESH D C., ADVOCATE) v. ALLOW THIS PETITION AND DIRECT
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
#1. SMT. ROOPA, D/O LAXMINARASIMHMAMURTY, W/O DAYANANDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O LINGAPPANAPALYA VILLAGE, HULIYAR HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 214.
#2. LAXMINARASIHMAMURTY, S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O OBALAPURA VILLAGE, SRIRAMPURA HOBLI – 577 542, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
#3. SMT. YAMUNA, D/O LAXMINARASIHMAMURTY, W/O LAXMIKANTH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O LINGAPPANAPALYA VILLAGE, HULIYAR HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 214. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. JAGADEESH D C., ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:20362 CRL.P No. 13637 of 2023 AND:
#1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY SRIRAMPURA POLICE, HOSADURGA TALUK, REPRESENTED BY SPP., HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001.
#2. THE PROPRIETOR/DEALER, HOYSALA INDANE GRAMIN VITRAK, B.H.ROAD, HULIYAR – 577 527. CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
#3. THE AREA MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDANE AREA OFFICE, 4TH FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING, J.C.ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 002.
#4. THE MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., AMOGH MANSION 1ST FLOOR, OPP. INDIAN OIL PETROL BUNK, BARLINE ROAD, GENERAL KARIYAPPA STREET, K.R.EXTENSION, TUMKUR – 572 101. (BY SRI.HARISH GANAPATHI, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE …RESPONDENTS - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:20362 CRL.P No. 13637 of 2023 TO INCLUDE THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 AS ACCUSED AND FILE FRESH CHARGE SHEET BEFORE THE TALUK MAGISTRATE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition. In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 264
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.