SRI. NARAYAN C. R v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 s. 136(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Upholding the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. However, the respondents are hereby directed not to take any - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No.…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 30847 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) …PETITIONER BETWEEN: SRI. NARAYAN C. R. S/O LATE C. RAJAGOPALA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT ROYAL SHELTER LAYOUT, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, BENNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE 560 076. (BY SMT. SHEETHAL U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SHIVANAND, ADVOCATE) AND:
#1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE.
#2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE.
#3. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, KG ROAD, BANGALORE. SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No. 30847 of 2025 HC-KAR
#4. SMT. SUNITHA B D/O BOREGOWDA W/O RAM MOHAN RAJU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.10, ASHWATHNARAYANA LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, 7TH STAGE, BANGALORE-78. (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN RP.472/2023 DATED 02/07/2025 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RA(S) NO.171/2023 DATED 13/10/2023 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE- B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No. 30847 of 2025 HC-KAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate notice for respondents Nos.1 to 3. Notice to respondent No.4 is not necessary for the following reasons:
#2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has raised a preliminary objection that having regard to the amendment brought to Section 136(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, w.e.f., 10.01.2025, petitioner will have to approach the Karnataka Revenue Appellate Tribunal questioning the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act.
#3. Upholding the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. However, the respondents are hereby directed not to take any - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No. 30847 of 2025 HC-KAR precipitative action for a period of four weeks to enable the petitioner approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.
#4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
#5. Office is directed return the original documents/certified copies, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy of the same for the file. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.