OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6 TH DAY OF JANUARY v. ANJARIA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M I ARUN
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:36-DB
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as not
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Judgment
W/O N BHADRINATH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS PROPRITRIX: SRI ARUNACHALESHWARA TRANSPORT, NO 16-140 UMANAGAR, OLD TOWN ANANTAPURAM-515 001 ANDHRA PRADESH. …COMPLAINANT Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI. SRIKANTH A., ADVOCATE) And:
SRI YOGESH THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER-CUM- CHAIRPERSON, KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY 1ST FLOOR, BMTC TTMC BUILDING SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027.
SRI C T MURTHY THE SECRETARY - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:36-DB CCC No. 1176 of 2024 KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY 1ST FLOOR, BMTC TTMC BUILDING SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 027.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR RESPONDENT …ACCUSED NO.3) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 9.1.2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.25000/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND BE PLEASED TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:36-DB CCC No. 1176 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. A. Srikanth for the complainant files the memo dated 06.01.2025 in which it is stated that since the order under contempt is complied with, the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the present contempt proceedings.
2. The memo is taken on record.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as not surviving. SD/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as not
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12; Constitution of India — art. 215.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.