(BY SRI DINESHKUMAR RAO K, ADVOCATE) v. HIGH COURT BUILDING
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M NAGAPRASANNA
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:38255
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 256
Judgment
2. SHRI. ROSHAN NORONHA, S/O LATE JOHN NORONHA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O NO.NIRUDEY POST, NIDODDI VILLAGE, MOODBIDRE TALUK - 574197. (BY SRI DINESHKUMAR RAO K, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS KAVYA G Location: High Court of Karnataka AND:
SHRI B K MURTHY, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN, TO THE PETITIONER GEOLOGIST, MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT, AGED ABOUT - MAJOR, MANGALORE - 575001, (AGE IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), (REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU -560001). …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE OFFENCE SPL.C.NO.91/2021 PETITIONER (FOR IN - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:38255 CRL.P No. 12935 of 2023 P/U/S.4(1),9,21(1),23(c)(1)(e) AND (G) AND 24(1)(E) OF MMDR ACT 1957 AND RULES 42,43(5 AND 7) AND 43(a) OF KMMC RULES, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANGALURU D.K. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 18.06.2024 had passed the following order:- "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition would be dismissed without reference to the Bench. "
Even today, office objections are not complied with.
Operative part
Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 256
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.