NCL77I2010 LOK ADALAT No. 1898 of 2011 · Karnataka High Court
Judgment
(By Sri Dayanand SPatil, Advocate) And Ir 1i! - M iuc ( I ) i \ S1it1 ‘h IC i ,i tI-( F H j - j, ‘‘li L ‘I I 1 (By Sri, SVishwajith Shetty, Adv for H I & (Fy r. S H gd. Mulkhand Advocate for R2) Iespondents uauvLV1VUV‘1011)101411KOUVflI)KO-)NOdNO‘)S1111OIlV3cLdV%JI11 OKL1Or101 (141VUW4(IW)AC1Lcr•nnanHeJkrIu tJ:4ssVdSI)LJWIOkOIfliII)O.) II(IC8001 :IIIT UZUHONOLLVYIIDNOO tti(u‘un’.ixijoasln1’9%lljj ìuauMpnp%1£c‘unquywtJ tijp’jsaaaiuiqiin, oooirr’JournsepaiXIP%EsieqjX1UMpuP /fl()(Vwr’t’fTWd 12fl”.)UIm’x1.p111(1111ILNIIIxIJOJ193.flf1TII0.Tj t jSUt10)paiueajaqi_ anpiaijrcapedaiTpaclsasatpsoj wiisi’roisjrnwampapiasanquotnaqjap /OOIYQLi qani(juopuesnoqjau.4£iuasa, qrjauosaadrQf) ‘&c atp01UOflJp17P1111TndapJONIBJ).)tflUPUOJ1TtadjoampNIIU(fljPd p’uijpm’jfl4njrunquinjicqppiewi’tnaqst’qwqiwnwu)dIuo) .flfljoiuatuainac o;u.qgujotpa.fll.llAfl41cJuJpJo.).w1111131.) LU)Ij)Cj17)TIifl%.fl) ., .TJ1T)U4T%iq fl) ‘‘O1.J’.lla’ 141)1J). P1 .asij’si)iIJJ” ,.uap.1Tr)1)qpUaJ-flLII[itUlalT1‘CJp‘a aX‘1, iTj’1,i, 41 (‘ -! j’.a1—.11. I $.%t.’I• )T •‘U0)atq. .q‘F’1101),%I T0tnqTi “1441 i‘IIP 1(l I) 2 t — 1 1 I I A. I — - IF I ( I a I r 3 3 (Jut ol un enhanced comp jicalion ci Mliii of Rs 1 00.000/ with lntewst Is orilt red to bs kept iii fixed dc pO%t1 In tin lijifif ni the appellant In ari VationalLic ci/Schecluk bank for a lJLJ iud c I 11’ i entak I t nhdia tin inlet’ ‘,l arc mcd on the .iid d po1t (‘he balance amount of R’. 5.OUU with ptnodIcalI interest r ordered to be i eleiseci in favout ol the a)peI1ant
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.