✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI. ABHISHEK DUBEY v. SMT. ANCHAL SHARMA

WP No. 30332 of 2024LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Case at a glance

Bench
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Neutral citation
2025:KHC:18479

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the pending appeal. All I.As. in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 30332 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. ABHISHEK DUBEY S/O LATE MANMOHAN DUBEY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O AT T-1, MARUTHI MEADOWS APTS 6TH G CROSS, K.G.PURA BENGALURU – 560 093 (BY SRI. ADITYA D., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. ANCHAL SHARMA W/O MR. ABHISHEK DUBEY, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O T-1, MARUTHI MEADOWS APTS 6TH G CROSS, K G PURA BENGALURU – 560 093 (BY SRI.AMITH, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT MAYOHALL, BENGALURU TRAFFIC COURT -1, IN CRL.MISC.NO. 04/2023 DATED: 30.08.2024, DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO REMOVE HIMSELF FROM THE SHARE HOUSE HOLD, TILL DISPOSAL OF THE PETITION, VIDE ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18479 WP No. 30332 of 2024 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed to quash the interim order passed by the Judicial Magistrate Traffic Court-1, at Mayo Hall, Bengaluru, in Crl. Misc. No.04/2023 dated 30.08.2024, directing the petitioner to remove himself from the shared house hold, till disposal of the petition.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent has raised objection with regard to the maintainability of this writ petition.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already preferred an appeal against the impugned order.

4.

In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the pending appeal. All I.As. in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP No. 30332 of 2024). ← Search more judgments