M/S. TRILLION LEAD FACTORY (P) LTD v. SRI. KOLIHALLI RAJANNA SHASHI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 s. 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1090 OF 2024 BETWEEN: M/S. TRILLION LEAD FACTORY (P) LTD., PLOT No.98-G, PHASE - II JIGANI INDUSTRIAL AREA ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU - 560 105. (BY SRI. SURENDRAN J.G. THUMBUCHETTY, ADV.) …COMPLAINANT CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka AND:
SRI. KOLIHALLI RAJANNA SHASHI THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (ENFORCEMENT) NO.2604/1, VBN HARISH ARCADE VADERAHALLI, B.M.ROAD RAMANAGARA - 562 159. …ACCUSED
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:36417-DB CCC No. 1090 of 2024 HC-KAR REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCE DEPARTMENT FINANCE SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. …PROFARMA RESPONDENT
THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NEW DELHI - 110 001. …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO HOLD THE ACCUSED HEREIN GUILTY OF CONTEMPT OF CURT FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 04.10.2024 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE HIGH COURT IN WP NO.27141/2024 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED WITH IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. IMPRISONMENT OF 6 MONTHS THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:36417-DB CCC No. 1090 of 2024 HC-KAR ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has filed a memo dated 15.07.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the contempt petition.
2. Memo is accepted.
Operative part
3. In view of the memo, this Civil Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 88
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — s. 12; Constitution of India — art. 215.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.