✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT. SUSHILAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P No. 11676 of 2023M NAGAPRASANNA

Case at a glance

Bench
M NAGAPRASANNA
Neutral citation
2026:KHC:16400

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Liberty so sought is granted. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 99

Judgment

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11676 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:

1. SMT. SUSHILAMMA D/O MYLAARAPPA W/O LATE B VENKATARAMANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

2. SRI LAKSHMINARAYAN S/O LATE B VENKATARAMANA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

3. SMT SUNITHA C/O J RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS ALL ARE R/A NO.434, 1ST MAIN GUDDADAHALLI MAIN ROAD HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560024 (BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR N., ADVOCATE) AND: ]

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY HEBBAL POLICE STATION BELLARY ROAD, HEBBAL JC NAGAR SUB DIVISION BENGALURU CITY DIST REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONERS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:16400 CRL.P No. 11676 of 2023 HC-KAR

2.

SRI. BALAJI No.192/2A, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR JANAJEEVAN CASTAL, KODIGEHALLI BENGALURU CITY KARNATAKA – 560 097 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1 SRI. S VELUMURUGAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 04.10.2023 REGISTERED BY THE HEBBAL P.S., IN CR.NO.222/2023 U/S 448, 504, 380 R/W 34 OF IPC PENDING I A.C.M.M BENGALURU AGAINST THE BEFORE THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER

1. Learned counsel appearing the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the petition, the police after investigation have filed the final report- charge sheet.

2. In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:16400 CRL.P No. 11676 of 2023 HC-KAR this Court to withdraw the petition and raise a challenge to the charge sheet.

3.

Liberty so sought is granted. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 99

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.P No. 11676 of 2023). ← Search more judgments