SRI. K. MANJUNATHA v. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
- Neutral citation
- 2026:KHC:27792
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Operative part
SRI. K. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE KARIYAPPA @ TAGADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.18/13/1, PRABHAKAR BUILDING IST CROSS, DODDABALLAPURA MAIN ROAD PUTTENAHALLI, YELAHANKA BENGALURU - 560 064 (BY SRI. ALLAH BAKASH M, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: …PETITIONER SMT. NAGAVENI. G. H. W/O K. MANJUNATHA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27792 WP No. 25816 of 2023 HC-KAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT GOWDAHALLI VILLAGE MALAGALU POST, KASABA HOBALI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. (BY SRI. NATARAJ BABA K, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 17.03.2023 PASSED ON IA.NO.1, IN THE M.C.NO.62/2022, ON FILE OF THE SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:27792 WP No. 25816 of 2023 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. Sri. Nataraj Baba.K learned counsel for the respondent submits that petitioner is not evincing any interest in the matter and though this Court clearly cautioned the petitioner that no further time will be granted, the petitioner has not choosen to conduct the case. On 03.06.2026 following order was passed. "Sri. Benaka.K representing Sri. Allah Bakash.M learned counsel on record for the petitioner seeks time. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent projects urgency. To give fair opportunity, time for a week is granted. List the matter on 10.06.2026. No further time will be granted". The petitioner obtained an interim order in the year 2024. Though the matter was listed earlier under the caption for dismissal, basing on the submission that was made by learned counsel for the petitioner on 12.08.2025, the matter was - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:27792 WP No. 25816 of 2023 HC-KAR ordered to be removed from the caption 'for dismissal'. However, even thereafter petitioner has not chosen to pursue the matter diligently. Therefore, this Court is of the view that there are no grounds to grant further time. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.