SRI K.G.UTHAPPA v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 26485 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) …PETITIONER BETWEEN: SRI K.G.UTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE K.K. GANAPATHY R/AT.T.R. ROAD, PONNAMPET TALUK, PONNAMPET, KODAGU-571 216 (SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED) (BY SMT. LEELA P., ADVOCATE) AND:
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH, 11/90, 3RD FLOOR, OPP. TRUST WELL HOSPITAL, NEAR OLD SHIVAJI THEATRE, J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 002. REP BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER.
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, HASSAN BRANCH, SRICHARANA COMPLEX OPP. SATHYA COMFORT, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:5610 WP No. 26485 of 2025 HC-KAR HASSAN-573 201 REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIGNESH S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED E-AUCTION SALE NOTICE DATED 29.07.2025, NOTICE OF SALE UNDER THE HYPOTHECATION AGREEMENT, STATUTORY NOTICE, SALE NOTICE FOR SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SARFAESI ACT, 2002, A COPY OF WHICH IS HEREIN PRODUCED ANNEXURE-G VIDE BEARING SBI/SARB/MKC/ASJ/F5894/ 2025-26/237, ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, AS BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, AND UNSUSTAINABLE IN LAW IN AO FAR AS PETITIONER ARE CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:5610 WP No. 26485 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition stating that the petitioner had challenged the proceedings initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, (referred to as ‘SARFAESI Act’). However, he is not willing to prosecute this writ petition any further. Memo is taken on record.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
All I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.