✦ Karnataka High Court

KARNATAKA v. (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP)

Writ Petition No. 24502 of 2023M NAGAPRASANNA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. INSPECTOR OF POLICE SURATHKAL POLICE STATION SURATHKAL MANGALORE TALUK D.K. DISTRICT 575014 (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO-QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER…

Judgment

(BY SMT. MONISHA N.S. ,ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE SURATHKAL POLICE STATION MANGALORE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONER - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:32631 WP No. 24502 of 2023 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA BENGALURU 560 001

2.

INSPECTOR OF POLICE SURATHKAL POLICE STATION SURATHKAL MANGALORE TALUK D.K. DISTRICT 575014 (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO-QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.1830/2021 (ARISING FROM CRIME NO.95/2019 OF SURATHKAL POLICE STATION) ON THE FILE OF HONBLE JMFC II COURT, MANGALORE REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUISHABLE U/S 20(b)(ii)(A), 27(b) OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 AND SECTION 130(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:32631 WP No. 24502 of 2023 ORAL ORDER This Court, on 18.06.2024 had passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows: “Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition would be dismissed without reference to the Bench.” Even today, the learned counsel for petitioner has not complied with the office objections. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 245

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 24502 of 2023). ← Search more judgments