✦ Karnataka High Court

GURUAPPA @ v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

(BY SRI. RAGHU O. K., ADVOCATE) AND:

#1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY J C NAGAR POLICE, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, BANGALORE 560001.

#2. ARADHANA W/O RAMAKRISHNA N PUNJA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO G1,GROUND FLOOR, EMBASSY PLACE NANDIDURGA ROAD, JAYAMAHAL EXTN, BANGALORE 560056 (BY SRI. THEJESH.P., HCGP FOR R-1) …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482(FILED UNDER SECTION 528 BNNS) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:40470 CRL.P No. 10122 of 2024 BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLIANT IN CR.NO.200/2023 REGISTERED BY J.C.NAGAR POLICE STATION PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 8th ACMM BENGALURU CITY FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 294, 504, 506 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo dated 27.09.2024 seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The undersigned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner has challenged the FIR and Complaint before this Hon’ble Court in the present petition, whereas the it has come to the knowledge of the petitioner that Chargesheet has been filed before Trial Court, Hence the Petitioner seeks the leave of this Hon’ble Court to challenge the Chargesheet filed by Respondent police and entire proceedings before Trial Court, hence this Memo for Withdrawal of the present Criminal Petition. The petitioner Seeks liberty challenge the Chargesheet and Entire - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:40470 CRL.P No. 10122 of 2024 Proceedings in the interest of justice. Hence this Memo.”

#2. The memo is placed on record and in terms of the memo, the petition stands disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 10122 of 2024). ← Search more judgments