(BY SRI. NATARAJA BALLAL, ADVOCATE) v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VEMGAL
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M NAGAPRASANNA
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:45484
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 504, 506
Judgment
SRI. SRIKRISHNA H, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, S/O HANUMANTHAPPA, ADVOCATE, R/AT DANAVAHALLI VILLAGE, NARASAPURA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK - 563 133, KOLAR DISTRICT. (BY SRI. NATARAJA BALLAL, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VEMGAL POLICE STATION, KOLAR TALUK REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE - 560 001. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI. HARISH V, S/O DODDA VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT DANAVAHALLI VILLAGE, NARASAPURA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK - 563 133, KOLAR DISTRICT. (BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R, HCGP FOR R1) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:45484 CRL.P No. 10604 of 2024 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS SC NO. 128/2023 (REGISTERED BY THE R1 VEMGAL POLICE STATION IN CRIME NO. 210/2022, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 307, 323, 324, 504 AND 506 READ WITH SECTION 149 OF IPC) ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR AGAINST THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP on instructions would submit that the charges have been framed and the petition would not be entertain able at this juncture.
2. In the light of the charges being framed, the entertainment of the petition will run foul of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR KUMAR1. 1 (1994) 4 SCC 142 - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:45484 CRL.P No. 10604 of 2024
Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 99 CT: BHK
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.