SRI ABDUL RAHIM v. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL OFFICER
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 19, 21, 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Having taken note of the submission made by Sri. Satishkumar.K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Veeresh R Budihal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent as the grievance of the petitioner as to the action taken by the respondent in freezing the…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 25404 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI ABDUL RAHIM S/O ABDUL RAHMAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PRIVATE TEACHER # 60, 4TH A CROSS, ILYAS NAGARA, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078, KARNATAKA. (BY SRI. SATISHKUMAR K, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL OFFICER IMA AND OTHER KPIDFE ACT CASES, 3RD FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, V.V.TOWER, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VEERESH R BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE) ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE BEARING NO. SPLOCA/IMA/ENQ-1/08/2025-26 DATED
12.06.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT-SPECIAL OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:53700 WP No. 25404 of 2025 HC-KAR PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 2004, AS BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, AND IN VIOLATION OF THE PETITIONERS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLES 14, 19 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Operative part
Having taken note of the submission made by Sri. Satishkumar.K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Veeresh R Budihal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent as the grievance of the petitioner as to the action taken by the respondent in freezing the Bank account of the petitioner, I am of the view that there is no impediment for the petitioner to approach the competent authority with relevant particulars for redressal of their grievance. In the event, if the petitioner approach the competent authority, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:53700 WP No. 25404 of 2025 HC-KAR competent authority shall take appropriate action, in the matter, in accordance with law. With this observation, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19, 21, 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 12 Jun 2025. The bench was E S INDIRESH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.