(BY SRI. RAJADITHYA SADASIVAN, ADVOCATE) v. BANGALORE-560041
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Companies Act, 2013
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XXXIX rr. 1, 2
Key paragraphs
- Para 1414. SMT. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEAR W/O. MUNISWAMY RAJU RESIDING AT NO.9-2, 35TH CROSS, 4TH T BLOCK JAYANGAR, BANGALORE-560041. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH PORTION OF ANNEXURE-A ORDERS DATED 11.09.2024 REFUSING TO…
Judgment
1. KUM. THRISHA RAJU A.S AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS D/O. SRI. A.C. SRINIVASA RAJU
2. KUM. KEERTHI RAJU A.S AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS D/O. SRI. A.C. SRINIVASA RAJU BOTH PETITIONERS RESIDING AT NO.711, 7TH MAIN, 3RD PHASE, J P.NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560078 (BY SRI. RAJADITHYA SADASIVAN, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:
M/S BLUE HORIZON HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.172/1, SRINIVASA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BILEKAHALLI, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 076. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. A.C. SRINIVASA RAJU
M/S. INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 M-62 AND 63, 1ST FLOOR, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI-110001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:43054 WP No. 26262 of 2024 MANAGING DIRECTOR
M/S. ASIA PRAGATI STRATEGIC INVESTMENT FUND-ASIA PRAGATI REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT FUND ORBIS FINANCIAL CORPORATION LTD. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 4 A, OCUS TECHNOPOLIS, SECTOR 54, GOLF CLUB ROAD, GURGAON-122002 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MANAGING DIRECTOR
M/S. VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT IL AND FS FINANCIAL CENTRE, PLOT NO.C 22, G BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI-400 051 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ALSO, CORPORATE OFFICE AT THE QUBE, 6TH FLOOR, 602, A WING HASAN PADA ROAD, MITTAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MAREL ANDHERI (EAST) MUMBAI-400 059
SRI. A.C.SRINIVASA RAJU AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O.LATE CHANDRASHEKAR RAJU RESIDING AT NO.711, 7TH MAIN, 3RD PHASE J P.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560078
SMT.PUSHPA RAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O KUMARASWAMY RAJU RESIDING AT NO.136, 3RD CROSS, - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:43054 WP No. 26262 of 2024 3RD MAIN, DOLLARS LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR 4TH PHASE, BANGALORE-560078
SMT. A.R.PREMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS W/O.LATE A.M. RAMA RAJU RESIDING AT 10TH MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR 5TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560041
SMT. A.R.GAYATHRI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS W/O DAMODARA RAJU RESIDING AT NO.6, 3RD CROSS, K.R. LAYOUT, JP NAGAR 6TH PHASE, BANGALORE-560078.
SMT. A.R.SHRUTHI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS W/O. ACHUTHYA B.R. RESIDING AT 10TH MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR 5TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560041
SMT. A.V.GEETHA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O.LATE A.M VASUDEVA RAJU
SRI. A.V.SACHIN RAJU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O.LATE A.M.VASUDEVA RAJU
SRI. A.V.NITIN RAJU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O.LATE A.M.VASUDEVA RAJU RESPONDENTS 10 TO 12 RESIDING AT NO.292/A, 34TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR 4TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560011 - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:43054 WP No. 26262 of 2024
SMT. SUNDARAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEAR W/O. K.V. KUPPA RAJU RESIDING AT NO.281, 8TH MAIN ROAD, DOLLARS COLONY, J.P. NAGAR 4TH PHASE, BANGALORE- 560078
Operative part
SMT. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEAR W/O. MUNISWAMY RAJU RESIDING AT NO.9-2, 35TH CROSS, 4TH T BLOCK JAYANGAR, BANGALORE-560041. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH PORTION OF ANNEXURE-A ORDERS DATED 11.09.2024 REFUSING TO GRANT EX- PARTE INJUNCTION IN APPLICATIONS IN ANNEXURE-K, L AND M, I.E IA NO.1-3 UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 CPC, IN O.S.NO.6184/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-43) AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT INJUNCTION RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS FROM: (A) ALIENATING, ENCUMBERING OR IN ANY WAY DEALING WITH THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY OR PORTIONS THEREOF (B) CHANGING THE NATURE, CHARACTER OR STRUCTURE OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY OR PORTIONS THEREOF (C) DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONERS FROM THE JOINT POSSESSION OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY OR PORTIONS THEREOF. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 5 - NC: 2024:KHC:43054 WP No. 26262 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013; Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXXIX rr. 1, 2.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.