OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER v. ANJARIA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K V ARAVIND
- Neutral citation
- 2024:KHC:44756-DB
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 215
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
Judgment
SRI. K. DEEPAK, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O. MR. KRISHNA WORKING AS COURT OFFICER, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, PRINCIPAL BENCH, BENGALURU - 560 001 …COMPLAINANT Digitally signed by PRABHAKAR SWETHA KRISHNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI. SAMEER SHARMA, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT. MANASA KRISHNAPPA DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 146, 8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003
SRI. K.S. NAVEEN ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (HOUSING AND ORS.) HAVING OFFICE AT ALI ASKER ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001 - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:44756-DB CCC No. 995 of 2024
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATION MS BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY …ACCUSED (BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVT. ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 AND RULE 3 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981, PRAYING TO FIND THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 GUILTY OF COMMISSION OF CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER DATED
01.07.2024 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.16270/2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO CONVICT THE ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 FOR THE SAME AND CONSEQUENTLY ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 TO IMPRISONMENT FOR A TERM OF SIX (6) MONTHS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:44756-DB CCC No. 995 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Shri Sameer Sharma for the petitioner fairly submitted that in view of the compliance affidavit, the present contempt petition does not require to be prosecuted further.
2. In view of the submission, nothing further survives in the present contempt petition.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of as not surviving. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Another 1 relationship is under human verification and not counted above.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
Later judgments that treat this case