SRI. RANGASWAMY v. SMT. NAGAVENI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of reserving
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Subject to the aforesaid directions and leaving open all contentions to be decided by the Executing Court, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 24889 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. RANGASWAMY S/O LATE DODDATHIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT MADAHALLI ROAD, 2ND WARD, GUNDLUPETE, CHAMRAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571313 (BY SRI. P.N. NANJA REDDY.,ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. NAGAVENI SECRETARY, LITTLE CHAMPS SCHOOL, HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT, CHAMRAJNAGAR - 571313 GUNDLUPET. …PETITIONER B M Location: High Court of Karnataka …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ENTIRE CONSTITUTION OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN EX. NO. 20/2022 PENDING ON THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLEPET (ANNX-C) AS THE SAME ARE ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND IN VIOLATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO GRANT ALL THE CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS CONSEQUENT UPON QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS AT ANNX-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:7242 WP No. 24889 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, quashing the entire Proceedings in Ex. No.20/2022 pending on the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Gundlepet (Annexure-C) as the same are illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justice. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent to grant all the consequential benefits consequent upon quashing the proceedings at Annexure-C.”
#2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.
#3. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would file objections to the main execution proceedings and contest the same accordance with law.
#4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the Executing Court may be directed to dispose of the execution proceedings as expeditiously as possible. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:7242 WP No. 24889 of 2025 HC-KAR
#5. The aforesaid joint submission is placed on record.
#6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file objections to the main execution petition. Upon the petitioner filing objections, Executing Court shall consider the same and hear both sides and dispose of the execution proceedings within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
#7. Subject to the aforesaid directions and leaving open all contentions to be decided by the Executing Court, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of reserving
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.