SRI. D.C. CHANDRA v. SRI. PRAKASH
Case at a glance
- Bench
- VIJAYKUMAR A PATIL
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:45422
Outcome
Withdrawn
is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.24924/2025 (GM-CPC) Location: High Court Of Karnataka BETWEEN: SRI. D.C. CHANDRA S/O CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT DYAVARAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK- 562 110. (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY, ADV.,) AND:
SRI. PRAKASH S/O CHIKKANARASIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT POOJANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK- 562 110 PH NO. 99021 49165.
SRI. NAGARAJ S/O NARASIMAPPA @ SUNKAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT BIJAVAR VILLAGE VIJAYAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK- 562 110 PH NO.97392 06077.
SRI. VENKATAPPA S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT DYVARAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK- 562 110 PH NO.9538 449438. …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:45422 W.P. No.24924/2025 HC-KAR THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING ANNEXURE-A DATED 05-08-2025, BY REFUSING TO GRANT EXPARTE INTERIM ORDER IN I.A.NO.1/25 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN O.S.NO.480/2025, PENDING IN 2ND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as under: "Undersigned counsel for the petitioner submits that, this Hon'ble court may please to permit the petitioner to withdrawn the petition as not pressed Same may be taken on record, in the interest of justice and equity. "
Operative part
3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.