✦ Karnataka High Court

PUSHPALATHA v. M THULASI SATHYANARAYANA

T G SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA SMT K T PREMALATHA2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA & SMT. K.T. PREMALATHA, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 7848/2022 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 1481/2024) BETWEEN 1 . PUSHPALATHA W/O LATE BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2 . REKHA N B D/O BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 3 . N B CHAYA D/O LATE BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT CHANDAGALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI SRIRANGAPATNA TQ MANDYA DISTRICT 571409. (BY SRI. SREENIVASAN M Y, ADVOCATE) ...Appellants 2 AND 1 . M THULASI SATHYANARAYANA D/O T.N. MUNIYACHATTIR MAJOR, R/AT NO. 1739, 4TH CROSS, P AND T BLOCK NORTH ANIKETHANA ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGARA MYSORE 570023. 2 . THE MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD NO. 2912, SRI VENKATESHWARA PLAZA 1ST MAIN, SARASWATHIPURAM MYSORE CITY 570 005 (BY SRI. JANARDHANA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) Respondents MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 10.08.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO. 1052/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, SRIRANGAPATNA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

2.

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

3.

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

4.

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the wife of the deceased i.e., appellant No.1, on proper identification. 4

Operative part

5.

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments