YOGESHA v. SRI CHANDREGOWDA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANU SIVARAMAN, RAJESH RAI K
Outcome
Dismissed
objections, failing which, petition shall stand dismissed without
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Key paragraphs
- Para 55 . MAHESHA THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., ANANDARAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU CITY-560009. …ACCUSED THE CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K AND CCC NO.996/2023 BETWEEN:
YOGESHA SON OF LATE SANNANANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/OF LAKSHMIPURA VILLAGE, KIKKERI HOBLI,KRISHNARAJEPTE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571426. …COMPLAINANT/S (BY SRI./SMT : DHANANJAYA V.S., ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SRI CHANDREGOWDA THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, THE KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., NO.10, H.L.B.C., SUB DIVISION, KIKKERI VILLAGE,AND HOBALI, KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571426.
KIJAR AHMED THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 2 CCC.NO.996/2023 KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., H.L.B.C. NO.3, KRISHNARAJAPETE TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT-571426.
VISWANATHA THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICER AT MANDYA, 1ST FLOOR, MANDYA CITY, MANDYA DISTRICT-571401.
DR. KUMAR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401.
Operative part
MAHESHA THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., ANANDARAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU CITY-560009. …ACCUSED THE CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO TAKE COGNIZANCE FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR THE DISOBEYING THE ORDERS PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P.NO.14765/2022 ON DATED 24.08.2022 AND DUE TO THE DISOBEDIENCE COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED PERSONS FURTHER PLEASED TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC., 3 CCC.NO.996/2023 THIS CCC IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. CORAM: HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Finally, two weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. (ANU SIVARAMAN) Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : SMV COMPARED BY : SMV COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: objections, failing which, petition shall stand dismissed without
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12; Constitution of India — art. 215.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.